Jokerman: the meaning of the lyrics and the music

Numerous reference books suggest that Jokerman is one of Dylan’s masterpieces. A great poetic adventure that encapsulates everyone and everything from Ode to a Nightingale by John Keats (1884) to… well, anything you like. All mixed with a mature and detailed reflection on Judaism, and the books of laws in the Old Testament.

Such approaches tend to ignore the fact that Dylan himself doesn’t like the piece much (see for one such interview), and the fact that when he has sung it live he has often chopped out verses seemingly at random and just thrown it in “cos the kids like it.”

Dylan’s view seems to be that it is a failed song, a song the lyrics of which he changed too often for it to work any more. As for the music, it is more complex than the old 12 bars tunes but not exactly the first movement of a string quartet.

And one thing is for sure (and is missed out in most commentaries) the music and the lyrics have nothing in common.

The music is simple, bouncy, fun, but not especially exciting or unusual but still a good tune that works, it serves as a basis for a stream of words, but not much more. For the song to work, the lyrics have to be both electrified and at one with the music, meaning they have to be bouncy and fun.

Consider for a moment the great work which apparently was recorded in time for Infidels but didn’t make the cut – “Blind Willie McTell”. Here the brooding melody and chord changes fit perfectly with the brooding lyrics, even if neither have anything to do with Blind Willie McTell. That’s fine because the man of the title has nothing to do with the song.

But in Jokerman we seem to have a bit of a muddle – a bouncy tune that has nothing to add to the feeling – except that the Jokerman is a Jokerman. Which would work if there was something jokey in the lyrics, but even from line two, “While the eyes of the idol with the iron head are glowing” we have nothing funny. Are you going to make a joke out of “a snake in both of your fists”? I suspect not.

OK, comes the answer, he’s not that kind of Jokerman – he’s more the kind that plays a joke on the whole universe – a nasty twisted joke – a devil with an evil laugh.

Right – so where does that leave, “Jokerman dance to the nightingale tune, Bird fly high by the light of the moon”?

It is all so confusing, that we look for some sort of way out. This is not surrealism, or the musical version of a Jackson Pollock, it is something quite different.

But what/

When we hear, with that same bouncy 2/4 tune which mutates into 4/4 at the chorus, that suddenly Dylan is talking about Leviticus and Deuteronomy, the books of laws in the Old Testament, we think, maybe this is going to sort it out. Dylan is laughing at the old laws – that’s what the bouncy song is about.

And here there certainly needs to be comment and a half. Leviticus is the book of the Bible that tells us to stone to death married women who have sex with another man, who tell us not to approach the house of the Lord if wearing clothes made of two or more cloths, and not to approach if our eyesight is not sound (which cuts out anyone wearing glasses). There is a lot of stuff about killing goats too.

But there is nothing on this. Not even with the wildest imagination is there anything there that offers us any insight. I am not searching for meaning any more than I am searching for meaning in Jackson Pollock, to take the example that came into my head earlier. All I am doing is looking for an insight. A way of saying yes, this is why the melody is like it is, why we have a 2/4 verse and a 4/4 chorus. Why we have a Jokerman.

I think Dylan was right in that interview – there is nothing but nothing here apart from a set of lines along a vaguely messianic theme to inappropriate music.

And that is not to remove the one great track from the album, as some would have it. Rather it is to let us look elsewhere, where the issue is entirely Israel. Neighbourhood Bully, for example, is a song that I, with my political views, am extremely unhappy with, unless I twist the meaning so much I think I leave behind anything Dylan meant. But as a work of art, it is something far more than Jokerman ever became.

I really want to understand this song, so ultimately of course the failing is mine, not Dylan’s because I can’t get to grips with it at all.  I just so wish I could.

Index to all the reviews

This entry was posted in Infidels, The Songs. Bookmark the permalink.

63 Responses to Jokerman: the meaning of the lyrics and the music

  1. Doug Johnson says:

    The song is about a man who has incurred the judgment of God. If this man embraces the truth of his crime against God and repents, he will be set free. If he does not embrace the truth and continues as “the fool”, he will lose his soul to the devil.

  2. Buford says:

    The Jokerman is the “The Fool” of the Tarot. If the fool embraces truth and turns from his wayward ways, he will be saved. If not, he will lose his soul for all eternity.

  3. Hello there Tony, Thank you for posting this analysis of a song from Bob Dylan’s Music Box: Come and join us inside and listen to every song composed, recorded or performed by Bob Dylan, plus all the great covers streaming on YouTube, Spotify, Deezer and SoundCloud plus so much more… including this link.

  4. Pat Daly says:

    Why spend time occupying the mind of another…enjoy the song for what it is and how you feel when you hear it.
    look at all the comments,everyone has their own meaning,Dylan himself most likely doesn’t understand it.

    …a subconsious lament,with scattered thought.

  5. TonyAttwood says:

    In answer to the opening question, “to help broaden one’s understanding”

  6. Mark Zucker says:

    It’s about the god-like power people feel they possess, and they do, but they are sick with vanity and unable to manifest their godliness in this world, and even in our most sincere and earnest endeavors we are rendered a joke by our self-absorption and lack of perspective, grinning as we risk becoming monomaniacal monsters. Humans and their myths vs. humans and their actions: It is to laugh. Darkly.

  7. Neely Lyles says:

    Jokerman is a description of a metaphorical person, (persona, if you will) that, like many of us, embodies both mildly and wildly contradictory characteristics. I believe the basis of Jokerman is that of the trickster / coyote; then so much more the oppositions of the contradictions; beauty, banality, belief, scorn, meaningless evil, exaggeration, truth, conjecture, myth, barbarism, pathos .. To quote Charles Portis, “Who knows what’s in the heart of a man?” Time, of course, is mostly meaningless.
    And Dylan’s offhand attempts to denigrate the song are just another trickster / coyote contradiction: truth, irony, and untruth live in harmony / disjunction together in this song by Loki Bob.

  8. LarryFyffe says:

    Bob Dylan goes no for the simple answer as presented by orthodox religion, ie, God Himself , the all-powerful one, can be viewed as the trickster – a sender of thunder, misery and war:

    There’s a long, long trail a-winding
    Into the land of my dreams
    Where the nightingales are singing
    And the white moon beams
    (Zo Elliot: There’s A Long, Long Trail A- Winding)

  9. Jenny says:

    Songs like Jokerman earned the Noble. Brilliant lyrics.

  10. Jason Makeig says:

    Best review of Jokerman yet … Agree with your insights and add that … The song definitely reeks of the plight of the ‘poet’ as he/she embraces extreme vanity and dystopian outcomes of human folly .. yet beautifully juxtaposes earth forces that resonate with our deeper psyche. It’s a story of the spiritual empath looking through the worlds mediocrity that causes degraded human outcomes .. love it !!!

  11. stargel says:

    I always picture Dylan finishing the outlines of a song like a painting which looks more or less like its subject, and then he spends a chunk of time applying overlays of paint on top of it, obscuring the original meaning.

    What I see in this picture is a song about a peaceful man who inexplicably exists in spite of the world around him who seeks to draw him into its violence and madness. This man could be Jesus (think there’s indications that the Joker is a reference to Jesus in other songs) but could be anyone who chooses simple existence and enjoyment over power and corruption.

  12. Ddbehar says:

    The meaning of this song is fairly straightforward. It is written in the second person to the Jokerman. He wrote it right after ending a brief period as a born again Christian and returning to his Jewish faith. The Jokerman is Jesus. The references are numerous. Here are a few:

    Standing on the water – Jesus

    Casting your bread – Jesus

    Friend to the martyr – Jesus and John the Baptist

    Friend to the woman of shame – Jesus and Mary Magdalene

    Book of Leviticus and Deuteronomy…are your only teachers – Jesus was a rabbi and lived his life as a practicing Jew

    Jesus is the Jokerman because he ‘tricked’ Dylan into this faith. I know this is bound to offend some Christians but he has just left Christianity to return to Judaism. The references are unmistakable.

  13. Jochen Markhorst says:

    I’m not Christian and far from offended, but I’m afraid you’d be found guilty of cherry picking in a Dylanologist Court, Ddbehar. The lyrics comprise 463 words – you managed to trace 25 of them back to Jesus. True, these five particular fragments do seem to refer to Jesus – although four of them could refer to numerous other historical or literary personas as well.

    But this You is also “born with a snake in [his] fists”, is “going to Sodom and Gomorrah” (which were destroyed some 3000 years before Jesus was born), is taught “the law of the jungle”, has a sister “nobody there would want to marry” and apparently is clairvoyant while staring into “a fiery furnace”… metaphors, obviously, but still: it requires quite some bending over backwards to find Jesus references herein, I suppose.

    In short: your claims that “The meaning of this song is fairly straightforward” and that “The references are unmistakable” seem somewhat insubstantiable and a bit too bold.

    That being said: I can’t produce a better interpretation either. And neither can Dylan, for what it’s worth: “That’s a song that got away from me” (interview with Paul Zollo, 1991).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *