Pay in Blood: the meaning of the music and the lyrics

What is the most appalling word you could say to a young Jewish musician?

Actually, that’s a dumb question, because although I’ve heard most of them, being born and brought up in a part of North London where the insults are still heard, but not being Jewish, I don’t really know the answer.

But I can think of one.  Given that Christianity records that Jesus Chris was killed by Jews and betrayed by Judas Iscariot into the hands of the Sanhedrin priests in return for thirty silver coins, calling a young Jewish man “Judas” must be pretty high on the list of insults.

So when we consider May 17, 1966, the day when Keith Butler, at the Free Trade Hall in Manchester, shouted the word “Judas” at Dylan.

Dylan replied, “You’re a liar!” and a moment later “Play it fucking loud”.

And there it stayed, a moment in Dylan’s history, until Pay in Blood.   Rolling Stone made it the 9th best song of the year and in reviewing it everyone focuses on the extraordinary lyrics.  But as always with Dylan we need to consider more than this – and particularly more than the lyrics we can make fit into our own preferred interpretation.

The conensus is that this is vicious – the most vicious song ever some say.   “It’s like a pilot pitch for Masters of War” is one of the comments that I rather liked.

The music however tells us something.  What we notice most of the time is the rocking motion of the chords C – F – C.   These chords can rock, because they both contain the note C, which means the bass can on occasion hold the C, and let the chords switch around above.  They rock back and forth in a gentle way that, when you focus on them, seems very odd, considering the lyrics.

Because even with the lyrics this gives us a sense of security, of certainty, of knowing where we are.  But then in each verse, suddenly that is pulled away from us – as indeed it needs to be, because these lyrics are not lyrics to be comfortable with.

The Masters of War comparison is interesting because in that song the music is driven on by the relentless beat that the guitar chords incorporate – it pounds away and won’t let go.  But here the band doesn’t do this, but time and again it lulls us into this security, only to wrench us out by playing two chords that don’t give us a rocking motion at all – D minor and A minor.  Now there’s nothing amiss here – these two chords fit perfectly in the key of C major that Dylan is composing in.  But the jerkiness or these two chords is so different from the lilting rocking motion, it almost throws us overboard.

So we are in a strange world.   Hard difficult words, against a gentle rocking rhythm broken suddenly by two lines that take us to the edge of the cliff, and back.

This is how it works in verse one…   I have written the two lines based on the minor chords in italics.

Well I’m grinding my life out, steady and sure
Nothing more wretched than what I must endure
I’m drenched in the light that shines from the sun
I could stone you to death for the wrongs that you done
Sooner or later you make a mistake,
I’ll put you in a chain that you never will break
Legs and arms and body and bone
I pay in blood, but not my own.

After this we have a musical pause, which carries on the rocking motion, without any notion that the minor chord disruption in lines five and six happened.  One is left blinking, looking around, asking “what the hell happened there?”

Which is a bit like the “Judas” shout.  At  the time, we all knew what it meant – the expression of the annoyance that Dylan had turned his back on the solo guitar and singer approach of his early days, and ventured into rock with its electric guitars.  Here “Judas” just means, you have betrayed us.  But shouted at a young Jewish guy, it takes on a different meaning.

The image the lyrics give us is of an old man who is bitter about what others have done.  In the song we don’t know what they have done, and if “you” is one person or a group or the government or everyone.

The old man is powerless, but by sitting there, rocking back and forth (like an old timer on the veranda of his southern home looking out across main street in his small town) he is just waiting for that mistake to happen.

From this very first intermission section (lines five and six) we are left wondering.  Who is it Bob?  Who are you targeting this time?

I think that it is viable to think that after all this time it is Dylan’s answer to the “Judas” shout.

My starting point is a Rolling Stone interview with Mikal Gilmore Dylan said, “These are the same people that tried to pin the name Judas on me. Judas, the most hated name in human history! If you think you’ve been called a bad name, try to work your way out from under that. Yeah, and for what? For playing an electric guitar? As if that is in some kind of way equitable to betraying our Lord and delivering him up to be crucified’.   All those evil motherfuckers can rot in hell.”

Of course arguments have been made that this is a religious song and the blood is the blood of Christ.  The view is that, “Nothing more wretched than what I must endure” relates to Paul’s question in Romans 7:24 “Wretched man that I am! Who shall deliver me from the body of this death?”

But to make this work you have to argue that Dylan has been writing religious songs all the time, so that “Feel like my soul has turned into steel, I’ve still got the scars that the sun didn’t heal. . .” is not about psychological scars from betrayal, but rather the scars not healed by the Son of God. (Sun/Son – clever eh?)

This is given depth by the references to stoning to death – which Leviticus is rather keen on for the sin of adultery, which if I read my gossip columns correctly would rather do it for Bob.

The trouble with these arguments is that each one stretches a point more and more.  The sun / Son idea, and seeeing “The more I die, the more I live” not as just a juxtaposition of concepts that every poet worthy of the name can get up to, but instead “He must increase, but I must decrease” (John 3:30), really does take elasticity too far.  

The problem is that Dylan doesn’t need to do this sort of long-distance expansion of notions, because he is perfectly capable of saying what he wants to say.  “Come you masters of war you build the big guns” is about as direct as you can be, as is “You’ve gotta serve somebody”.

The poetry and metaphors of the Bible are beautiful (except perhaps when it comes to casting out people who approach the house of the Lord in clothes made of two cloths) but Dylan is a fine poet himself, and he doesn’t need obscure half references – especially not after Trouble.   Remember the verse….

Drought and starvation, packaging of the soul, Persecution, execution, governments out of control, You can see the writing on the wall inviting trouble. 

You don’t come through a religious conversion and write lines like that and then place loads of Biblical references that only the intelligencia will get, in a song a few years later.

So ok, “You’ve got the same eyes that your mother does, if only you could prove who your father was. . .” could be a reference to the virgin birth, but from what I know of Dylan’s journey I’d say he’s simply calling the person a bastard.

In the Old Testament, as I (an atheist) understand such matters, the blood is the soul – the soul is in your blood.   “It is the blood that makes atonement for one’s life”.  Yes, its our old “stone them to death” pal the Book of Laws  (Leviticus 17:11).  “I pay in blood, but not my own” is, in this interpretation, the rejection of one’s own blood being the key to one’s soul, because we don’t have souls.  We have what we make of ourselves, our morality, our decision to be good, kind, loving, helpful people.

So, for me, the interpretation of this song as a Christian commentary makes no sense at all at any literary level.  And it fails at the musical level.

But as an old man looking back on that notorious “Judas” shout, it does make sense musically and lyrically.

Dylan in this song is the free-spirit, independent thinker, rocking in his rocking chair on the veranda, cursing those who have caused him problems and anguish in the past.

I take this view as the opening instrumental section gives no hint of any anger to come – but old men sitting in their rocking chairs can be vicious in their commentaries.   “You’re gonna get it, not me” is the message as he rocks back and forth, back and forth.

Sooner or later you make a mistake, I’ll put you in a chain that you never will break

This is an old man’s revenge.  For Dylan, the meaning is that he has the music, the music that he has created and which will live for hundreds and hundreds of years after he is gone.

Now I must admit I don’t get every reference – I’ve puzzled over the Southern Zone for some time, but without much luck.  There is a book called The Southern Zone which is about drugs, (but that would have been “I’ve circled around the Southern Zone”) and I think we can be fairly sure this is not about the Palmar Sur Airport in Costa Rica.   southern zone, is receiving international status with a $42 million expansion to the national airport, Palmar Sur Airport

But other lines are wonderful in that constant rocking rhythm, “Low cards are what I’ve got” is superb, followed by “But I’ll play this hand whether I like it or not”

Yes there is the reference to God in the song, but there’s also, Someone must have slipped a drug in your wine, You gulped it down and you cross the line”.   

But as always with Bob, you pay your money and take your choice.

Index of reviews.

Posted in Uncategorized | 41 Comments

Million Miles: the meaning of the music and the lyrics

There are many people who just don’t grasp what the blues is all about.  For these people it sounds repetitive, dull and simplistic.

Of course there is nothing wrong with not getting something – we all have areas of culture that we don’t understand, whether it is modern art, contemporary dance or the avant garde in orchestral music.

But what is sad is when people who don’t get an art form, then dismiss it, as if their cultural insight is the only valid one.

For those who “don’t get the blues” Million Miles is one of those songs that makes no sense at all.  So they revert to cynical commentary in the hope they are looking clever – whereas generally in fact, in relation to this song in particular and the blues in general they are making themselves look like prats.

Time Out of Mind was Dylan’s first release of original material since Under the Red Sky; his first in seven years.  And of course he was going to spend a lot of time in the album with the blues, and with the concepts of struggle, isolation, loss and despair – all topics that are fundamentally rooted in the blues.  And as I hope to show, above all in this song he talks of dissociation. 

Time Out of Mind won three Grammy Awards, including Album of the Year in 1998 – but this song, Million Miles, has never warranted much attention, which is a shame.

From the slow introduction, the slight fade, the drums, with the lead guitar, and then the rhythm guitar chunking in background half way between each beat – from all this in the first few seconds we know this is going to be a song right on the edge.

The voice is distanced with the slightest of echos, and the first line “You took a part of me that I really miss” confirms where we are.  I’m not me any more.  In fact I am not part of this world any more.

That very first line is really worth contemplating, in my view.  This is the exact opposite of Elvis bopping along with My Baby Left Me, this is the theft of the soul or the heart, or maybe both.  this is desolation.

You took a part of me that I really miss
I keep asking myself how long it can go on like this
You told yourself a lie, that’s all right mama I told myself one too
I’m trying to get closer but I’m still a million miles from you

This is the first reference to “That’s all right” – I’ll come back to that in a moment.  But above all this is loss; loss of the self, loss of material goods, loss of everything for now there is nothing left – but a loss that leaves the singer unable to talk about it.

You took the silver, you took the gold
You left me standing out in the cold
People ask about you, I didn’t tell them everything I knew
Well, I’m trying to get closer but I’m still a million miles from you

These are the nights when you don’t know if you’ve been awake or asleep or how you get to the morning.  This is the pain of loss, the hopelessness of loss, the total removal of the link with the real world.  I’m here, but I’m not here…

I’m drifting in and out of dreamless sleep
Throwing all my memories in a ditch so deep

Until he gets to the stage where he can’t let go for fear of what will happen next.

Well, I don’t dare close my eyes and I don’t dare wink

And there is the insult that she’s left him for someone anyone, who can give her the love and devotion she wants – and he let her go.

The last thing you said before you hit the street
“Gonna find me a janitor to sweep me off my feet”
I said, “That’s all right mama . . . you . . . you do what you gotta do”

“That’s all right mama” being a reference back to the early Elvis song (“son that girl you’re fooling with she ain’t no good for you”).  It is interesting that it comes twice, and it is interesting to think back not just to the “son that girl” line but the end of That’s All Right – Elvis’ very first record release.

I’m leaving town tomorrow
I’m leaving town for sure
Then you won’t be bothered
With me hanging’ round your door
But, that’s all right, that’s all right

For Dylan nothing is real, everything is lost, there are sounds in his words but no meaning, he is drifting from friend to friend but none of them can help him.

It is a powerful theme, and one that Dylan has used in many different ways.  Compare Million Miles for example with the later Tell Ol’ Bill, musically a totally different song in Dylan’s version, but one that talks of the same subject matter.

The opening verse of Tell Ol Bill contains the line, “All of my body glows with flame” which could easily have come from Million Miles.

Compare for example “You took a part of me that I really miss” with “You trampled on me as you passed” from Tell ol Bill.  These similar lines show how able Dylan is to deal with similar issues in totally different musical ways.

Or take “Gonna find me a janitor to sweep me off my feet” and its message of disassociation from the world (rather than disaffection with it), which is also expressed in “The hour has come to do or die.”

The lack of money is also a theme in each song “You took the silver, you took the gold” in Million Miles, and “I’ve hardly a penny to my name” in Tell Ol Bill.

Or try, “I’m drifting in and out of dreamless sleep” and “To drive the shadow from my head”.  It is not so much the words that are the same, but the background idea of being lost – an idea that Dylan fights with in so many songs.

One final comparison

“I’m stranded in this nameless place” and “Sometimes I wonder what it’s all coming to.”

The lyrical form is different because the musical form is different, but both songs speak of disassociation from the real world – a total feeling of Time Out of Mind, in fact   This song, Million Miles, and this album, is one version of Dylan on disassociation.  As Tell Ol Bill shows, this is not his only run in with this subject.

Index to the reviews

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Make you feel my love: the meaning of the music and the lyrics

By Tony Attwood

Review updated 15 October 2017.

Bob Dylan’s “Make You Feel My Love” appears on Time Out of Mind (1997) and was initially released by Billy Joel, before Dylan’s version appeared on the album.  Since then he has played it over 200 times in concert right up to July this year.

Since then it has been picked up by many different artists, all of whom have found within it a remarkable balance of music and lyric, evolving around a simple yet perfectly placed musical device.

But this was by no means a song that grabbed public attention for a short while before vanishing.   Adele had a hit with the song in 2008, and quite extraordinarily (for a Dylan song) it turned up in the UK TV series The X Factor, and on the widely viewed UK annual event, Comic Relief.  It was also used as one of the Songs for the Philippines after typhoon Haiyan.  

Even then it was not all over in the UK for “Make you feel my love”, for another hugely popular UK TV series, Strictly Come Dancing featured it before the UK radio station Heart Radio made Adele’s recording of the song the UK’s number one song of all time in its Hall of Fame Top 500.

Indeed the song has appeared in endless TV series, and the video of Adele’s version of the song still appears regularly.

For me this is a beautiful, beautiful song – and all the hidden depths that exist within Dylan’s music (but which those unable to hear the songs without prejudice fail to find), are fully revealed here – if only one takes the moment to appreciate the totality of what is going on.

In keeping with the approach of this site, I’m going to focus on the Dylan recording in Time out of Mind, but that’s not to say I won’t come back to other versions later.

The make up of the Time out of Mind album itself has to be the subject of a separate article, when I finally get around to writing the “conceptual nature of each album” series of articles which has been noted on the site for a while now, but is still not constructed.

But in short, the album starts at a low point, “Love Sick” and then goes down and down into the depths of despair and old age to “Not Dark Yet” before starting an improbable journey up again.  “To Make You Feel My Love” is a fundamental on that journey upwards.

Here it is

It is a simple love song in one sense – the message is plain, I love you now, I will always love you, if you ever need me, I will be there for you.  It has been said a million times before, but it is none the worse for that.

The metaphor / realism of the first two lines is striking for a popular song.  Who else has ever began a piece in this way?

Here’s Bob singing it in a different way in concert.

When the rain is blowing in your face
And the whole world is on your case

Behind this is one of Dylan’s favourite descending bass lines, but here it is different – he’s not descending through the sort of scale that everyone getting formal training on an instrument is made to play over and over again, but rather he’s moving chromatically.  This means if you are playing on a piano you take each note (irrespective of whether it is a black or a white note) and play it in sequence..  To see how this sounds, just go to a piano, find C sharp, and then just go down: C, B, B flat, A, A flat, G and so on.

I’ve written the descending bass notes out with the lyrics below…

[C-sharp] When the rain is blowing [C] in your face
[B] And the whole world is [B flat] on your case
[A] I could offer you a [G sharp] warm embrace
To make you feel my [C sharp] love

To go with this most gentle descent from the metaphor of everything going wrong to the resolution of love there is the perfect accompaniment of piano, organ and bass.  No thudding guitars or drums  – for Dylan has long since learned that you don’t have to fill every song with a band, and most particularly you don’t need an electric guitar or lots of twiddly bits.   If the message is simple, keep the song simple.

But musically there is more.  First C sharp – the key in which the song is written – is a very unusual key for Dylan to work in, and when Dylan goes to a key that he uses rarely, then like all songwriters, he does so to find something unusual.   This he does in the middle 8 where twice he sings a note (on “mind up yet” and “never do you”) which is not in the chord that is being played in the music.

It is a most unusual touch, as are the two chords played at the very start of the piece.  Hearing the song one would expect it to open with the first chord (C sharp major) but listen closely to that opening second and you hear two chords one immediately after the other (G sharp major and C sharp major).  It is the sign that we are stepping up, making the journey back from the depths of Not Dark Yet.   It is a musical “here we go”, or “time to sort this”.

I don’t mean by this that Dylan thinks these devices through – he might have done but it is much more likely that he simply played it, felt it fitted and kept it.  All I’m doing here is seeking to explain why that one little extra introductory chord of G sharp does so much in setting the song up.

Overall to understand this piece you simply need to approach it with an open mind.

The love song and the love poem have a long and honourable place in the tradition of English literature and poetry, and this song deserves a place there, because of the simplicity of the words and the overpowering gentleness of the message.

Indeed there was a series of programmes on BBC Radio 4 in which individuals were asked what piece of music they would leave for their loved ones to find after they themselves have passed on, and one participant in the show chose this, and spoke on it so eloquently for around 10 minutes, and I can fully appreciate why she chose this piece.

It is, in short, a totally uncluttered beautiful song of devotion.

When the evening shadows and the stars appear
And there is no one there to dry your tears
I could hold you for a million years
To make you feel my love

After that, what else could one possibly say?

What else is on the site

1: Over 400 reviews of Dylan songs.  There is an index to these in alphabetical order on the home page, and an index to the songs in the order they were written in the Chronology Pages.

2: The Chronology.  We’ve taken all the songs we can find recordings of and put them in the order they were written (as far as possible) not in the order they appeared on albums.  The chronology is more or less complete and is now linked to all the reviews on the site.  We have also recently started to produce overviews of Dylan’s work year by year.     The index to the chronologies is here.

3: Bob Dylan’s themes.  We publish a wide range of articles about Bob Dylan and his compositions.  There is an index here.

4:   The Discussion Group    We now have a discussion group “Untold Dylan” on Facebook.  Just type the phrase “Untold Dylan” in, on your Facebook page or follow this link 

5:  Bob Dylan’s creativity.   We’re fascinated in taking the study of Dylan’s creative approach further.  The index is in Dylan’s Creativity.

6: You might also like: A classification of Bob Dylan’s songs and partial Index to Dylan’s Best Opening Lines

And please do note   The Bob Dylan Project, which lists every Dylan song in alphabetical order, and has links to licensed recordings and performances by Dylan and by other artists, is starting to link back to our reviews

Posted in Uncategorized | 25 Comments

Trouble: The meaning of the music and the lyrics in the Dylan song

If you want to hear the end of the journey that started with “Serve Somebody” you need to listen to “Trouble”.

If you want to understand what turmoil Dylan went through in his mind during the years of the three “religious” albums listen to those two songs, one after the other.

If you ever want an example of just how far removed Clinton Heylin is from understanding the music about which he writes, just read his review of “Trouble” from Shot of Love

He says,

“One supposes a song like this came easily enough – after all, it has no tune, doggerel for the lyric and the most basic blues structure.  How hard can it have been?”

And here we have all the misunderstandings of Dylan, his emotions, his journey and his music all wrapped up in one dismissive paragraph.

Dylan’s musical roots come from two arenas – the blues and folk, and Dylan has paid tribute to the blues on almost every album that he has recorded.  The blues is a specific style and approach to musical expression which allows variations but within set formats.  Yes to some non-musical outsiders the blues just sounds like a very boring repetitive style – but then we have to ask, why do so many musicians return to the blues over and over again?  Why do so many rock musicians love to play the blues?

It is because within the limited structures it offers infinite variation and subtlety.   Indeed through his statement Heylin shows that he not only doesn’t get the blues, he doesn’t understand the whole concept of the holistic nature of piece of music.  It is the lyrics, it is the music, but it is also the overall sound which generates an emotional response which moves beyond the music in the same way that a brilliant novel or a stunning TV drama goes way beyond the words spoken or the action of the participants.  It is the way in which a great work of abstract art goes beyond the colours and shapes into something so profound it can’t be expressed through any direct representation of the world we see.

The sort of dismissive analysis that Heylin brings tells us nothing about anything apart from his prejudice and lack of grasp of music as a totality.    Listen to “Make you feel my love” on Time out of Mind, and you can analyse it through lyrics and chords and melody, but sweeping across that is the power of the emotion in the song.  That emotional content is as important as anything else in Dylan.  If it were not we might as well just do painting by numbers and playing scales, and have done with it.

In fact, vis a vis “Trouble,” Heylin is wrong on every one of his three counts of dismissal.   Of course there is a tune – there is as much of a tune here as blues classics like “Dust my broom” or “Smokestack Lightning” have.

As for, “The most basic blues structure” that is a comment that is wrong on every level.  The most basic blues structure is the 12 bar blues based around a line of song against one chord, the line repeated but against a chord four notes higher up the scale returning to the first chord, and an answering line which descends through the fifth of the scale, the fourth of the scale and back to the tonic – the chord we started with.

To put it another way, the most common approach is

  • Line 1: E major
  • Line 2: A major, E major
  • Line 3: B major 7, A major, E major.

“Trouble” has none of this.  In fact the chords are deliberately hidden behind a sequence of four notes (not chords) F, A flat, B flat, D flat.

What really makes this approach interesting is that this turns the piece to being one in a minor key – which is unusual in rock.  Not unique to Dylan, but a million miles from, “The most basic blues structure.”

To play this you need musicians who really know the blues – musicians who can get away from the dependence on chords, and instead think of melody from a blues perspective.  And that is what Dylan got for this recorded version of “Trouble”

As for the lyric, Dylan has endlessly played with lyrics throughout his songwriting career, from nonsense, to surrealism, to love, to lost love, to disdain…  Dylan also creates great tunes and non-tunes (a perfect example of the non-tune would be “Subterranean Homesick Blues” – the verse is on one note).

Here Dylan sings about fate – that when fate is against you, there is nothing you can do.  Just as when love enters your heart it takes you over and you lose control.  But now he goes further – because now he says, “Fate is always against you, and there is nothing, nothing, nothing you can do.”

Trouble in the city, trouble in the farm
You got your rabbit’s foot, you got your good-luck charm
But they can’t help you none when there’s trouble

Trouble
Trouble, trouble, trouble
Nothin’ but trouble

The repetition of the word in the chorus works, because it symbolises the way that when life is against you, one disaster falls on top of another, and for the downtrodden man with no job there is nothing.

Trouble in the water, trouble in the air
Go all the way to the other side of the world, you’ll find trouble there
Revolution even ain’t no solution for trouble

The song is the perfect blues concept – that trouble is just how it is.  It is the essence of mankind.  But it not the Christian concept of man falling from grace by turning his back on God.  It is in fact something far darker than that because mankind always causes trouble but there is no salvation here; there is no way out through serving somebody.

Drought and starvation, packaging of the soul
Persecution, execution, governments out of control
You can see the writing on the wall inviting trouble

Put your ear to the train tracks, put your ear to the ground
You ever feel like you’re never alone even when there’s nobody else around?
Since the beginning of the universe man’s been cursed by trouble

And there we have the end of Dylan the Christian.  Not “since the fall in the garden man’s been cursed by trouble” but from the very start – from the Big Bang.  And even religion (the “packaging of the soul”) is no way out. In this version of reality, even God is trouble.  And just in case you didn’t get that, Dylan stresses it from the other perspective.

Look into infinity, all you see is trouble

What this is, is one of Dylan’s most important pieces.  The fact that he has said that “trouble” is nothing to do with God’s punishment on us for turning away from the worship of God is dramatic in itself, but he is doing it with a walking blues line in a minor key – the ultimate rock music way of expressing that the world has not just gone wrong but is always wrong.

There is no salvation, there’s no pearly gates into Heaven, there is no New Jerusalem, no horsemen of the apocalypse.  There is no hope, it is always like this, on forever into futility and infinity.

This is the most extraordinary statement by Dylan – especially when you compare with “You’ve gotta serve somebody” with its all-encompassing vision that it doesn’t matter who you are or what you do, you have to choose the Devil or the Lord.  Two albums after that Dylan is saying exactly the opposite – it doesn’t matter what you do, it’s all bad news.  It was at the start and it goes on to the end.

So it is not just that Heylin misunderstands the music of the piece and dismisses the words, he also utterly fails to recognise the symbolic importance of what is a very powerful piece of music.  Dylan stands up and says, “there is no future, there is no past, only trouble”.  And if you are going to say that, what format could you ever use other than a walking blues?

If you want an extraordinary experience listen to “Serve somebody” from May 1979 and “Trouble” from May 1981.   Two years it took to make that extraordinary emotional and religious journey, and it was recorded all along the way.

If you ever want to hear an artist working out his beliefs and views as they change, via his art, you can do it here.

List of songs reviewed

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

Heart of Mine: Updated (again) review with 4 different versions

by Tony Attwood (updated 24 May 2020) (and again 5 January 2022 – I do with they would leave the copies on the internet alone!)

When Shot of Love came out in 1981 I was coming to the end of my time as a senior lecturer in music at a university in the south west of England.  A beautiful place to work, study and indeed bring up my very young family. but a little isolated; no one really to discuss the latest Dylan with.

So instead I foisted it on my students and I remember the playing of this track from the LP to one of my classes as being one of my final seminars before leaving academia for good.   As I recall they weren’t really fans of Dylan, but we reached the conclusion that this actually was a superb song, but the arrangement was a mess.

That was the view that I kept, until very late in the day I bought a copy of Biograph – by which time I’d left the academic world and was battling it out with a billion other lost souls as a writer.

Now there wasn’t even some bored and disinterested students around to debate intellectual concepts and reviews with, so I listened alone, after reading my daughters their good night story.  I went downstairs, played Heart of Mine on Biograph and shouted out “Yes!” thus waking them all up again.

So a firm ticking off from my wife, but pleasure inside for here was the proof: “Heart of Mine” is a fantastic song – we’d just been given the wrong version.

And later again as I found the time to read reviews and commentaries on Dylan, with all the details of the different recordings that were made of this song, I found that Dylan himself called his choice of version “perverse”.  Apparently it doesn’t even have Ringo Starr on bongos as is sometimes said – it seems he was hitting a tambourine occasionally.

The problem with the song is that because of the change of rhythm and style in the third line (“Don’t let her know” in the first verse, followed by the hanging “Don’t let her know that you love her”) it needs highly rehearsed top quality musicians to pull it off, and it seems that the recording Dylan chose to release didn’t have either the musicians or the rehearsal.

The change of rhythm between “Don’t let her know” and “Don’t be a fool don’t be blind” when performed properly, is a total master stroke musically, as I’ll try to explain.

The song has four beats in each bar but musicall Dylan surprises us with where each bar is actually starting.

In the first line, “Heart of mine be still,” the word “heart” comes on the second beat of the bar – there is no singing on beat one.  Very unusual.  Then in the next bar there is no singing at all until the word “be” on the last beat of the bar, leaving “still” sitting alone on the first beat of the next line.

The next line is quite different again as you can hear when playing the Biograph version.

But now focus on the next three lines if you have a moment to do so.

Don’t let her know.  Here Dylan pushes the words faster than the accompaniment, and then waits for the music to catch up.  We feel we’re rushing

Dont’ let her know that you love her.  Here the beats are more evenly spaced in the lyrics with “Don’t”, “Know” and “Love” having the accents – this is catchy and interesting, but a conventional use of the beat – in contrast to the fast line.   Even if we don’t know anything about music in terms of its construction, we are wondering where this is going – just as we have time to wonder where a sentence is going while a speaker is still delivering the sentence and seeming to be saying something very odd.

And what Dylan does in the light of this confusion is deliberately change the rhythm again – he’s virtually into triplets (three equal pulses to a single beat) with “Don’t be a”… But it is almost but not quite.

This is magical because the triplets give the feeling of wave like motion, the ups and down of the sea as it were.  But as I said, these are not perfect triplets, because the line is edgy – he is telling himself to stay calm, not to go over the line, not to make a fool of himself yet again.  Riding the waves is NOT the option he should be taking.

Don’t be a fool don’t be blind

This really is superb, and it is undoubtedly what Dylan appreciated that he had created.  But somehow he then chose to release a really poor version – as it was bound to be when he didn’t have a top rate drummer, and musicians who fully understood the song, working with him.

Even if you don’t follow my musical analysis, just compare the Biograph version of this song with any classic Dylan track.  Think of Rolling Stone, for example, with that relentless plod upwards in the music as he says, “Once upon a time” etc.  There’s a clear pulse and beat all the way.

But in “Heart of Mine” on Biograph, Dylan is in a totally different musical country

Which is not to say the Biograph version is perfect, far from it.  It is just that its errors are nothing compared to the disasters on the album version.  There are musical slips in the intro – the band is not sure what happens there but they do pull themselves together.

Just listen to the way Dylan suddenly softens his voice at “be still” – it is perfection in terms of delivery.  Just consider how the melody and the rhythm in the first two lines of each verse changes.  How often do we get that?  Very rarely.

The instrumental on the Biograph version is also much better than on Shot of Love – although again far from perfect, for this is a complex instrumental break to pull off.  But at least the organist gives it a go in a way that makes you think that he sure as hell knows what sort of musical piece he’s playing here.

On Shot of Love no one wants to take responsibility.  and why should they – it is a very complicated song, and Dylan clearly hasn’t said what he wants to happen.  So nothing does.

On the Biograph version the instrumental break is held until after the third verse, and yes the organist gets carried away with himself in the third line, but even so, this is heaven combined with the purgatory of the Shot of Love version.

The female vocals also work, whereas on the album, the singer is all over the place with her harmonies.  Mind you, with the band doing what it is doing, it is not surprising.

I’ve seen it written that this song is partially religious, partially a love song, but I don’t see that.  It’s a song in which the singer is worrying about his own behaviour, not because of any religious belief, but because he is concerned about not hurting others.  It is a moral song.

I suppose the argument that it relates to Jeremiah 17:9, “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?” is the starting point of the argument that there is a religious connotation, but I think it is a fairly feeble point.  Jeremiah had bigger things on his mind.  He wrote about the coming God-given disasters and the need to repent for the past worship of idols.  As I read it – and as I have said before I am not a Christian, Jew nor Muslim (and Jeremiah pops up in all three religions) – Jeremiah is not telling us that we shouldn’t fall for another woman while married to another.  If you want all those rules its Leviticus for you, not Jeremiah.

Besides which, if Dylan is seriously delivering the message of Jeremiah, or indeed any other prophet, is he really going to do it with what various writers have called a “loosey-goosey piano” and “honky tonk”.

I suppose it is possible, but then it would be good if Bob might touch on such points or give us a further clue in the lyrics – but he hasn’t.   And that I think is a viable issue, because if you think back to by Dylan with Gotta Serve Somebody we get Dylan’s religious message full on and it does not sound like Heart of Mine.

This, for me, is a piece of personal morality.  It is, quite simply, “I want you, but it would be wrong of me to have you.”

As for the lyrics – the lyrics provided on the official Dylan site don’t turn up on either version, both of which combine and change the third and four verses as shown on the site.

There’s nothing profound or magical here in the words, but great songs don’t need profundity, they need a superb mix of melody and lyric. And “Heart of mine go back home” is a damn sight better line than 99% of pop song lines, just as

Heart of mine go back where you been
It’ll only be trouble for you if you let her in

is a perfect way of saying “That woman is trouble”.

And what of

Heart of mine so malicious and so full of guile

Are there many more devastatingly self- loathing lines in popular music?  I doubt it.

And ok, ‘don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time!'” comes from hip, and from Baretta, and Dylan’s just turned it around.  So what?  It works for me.  It’s not brilliant, but it works.   Even Leonardo di ser Piero da Vinci got his maths out of skew sometimes.

Untold Dylan: who we are what we do

Untold Dylan is written by people who want to write for Untold Dylan.  It is simply a forum for those interested in the work of the most famous, influential and recognised popular musician and poet of our era, to read about, listen to and express their thoughts on, his lyrics and music.

We welcome articles, contributions and ideas from all our readers.  Sadly no one gets paid, but if you are published here, your work will be read by a fairly large number of people across the world, ranging from fans to academics who teach English literature.  If you have an idea, or a finished piece send it as a Word file to Tony@schools.co.uk with a note saying that it is for publication on Untold Dylan.

We also have a very lively discussion group “Untold Dylan” on Facebook with around 5500 active members. Just type the phrase “Untold Dylan” in, on your Facebook page or follow this link 

You’ll find some notes about our latest posts arranged by themes and subjects on the home page of this site.  You can also see details of our main sections on this site at the top of this page under the picture.  Not every index is complete but I do my best.

But what is complete is our index to all the 604 Dylan compositions and co-compositions that we have found, on the A to Z page.  I’m proud of that; no one else has found that many songs with that much information.  Elsewhere the songs are indexed by theme and by the date of composition. See for example Bob Dylan year by year.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

“I want you”: the meaning of the music and the lyrics in Dylan’s song

Somehow I managed to write two reviews of “I want you” in the early days of  this site.  This is one of them, and I’ve left this one alone.  On the other review I’ve added a number of recordings that seem to me to be of interest.  You can find it here

Tony Attwood


 

I Want You” was recorded in 1966, and issued as a single with Tom Thumb’s Blues on the B side.  

Reports suggest that the imagery that is at the heart of the song suggests that Dylan was experimenting with something far more than just a set of words.

One analysis (Andy Gill) says that the characters are “too numerous to inhabit the song’s three minutes comfortably”, and that is where I depart from the traditional interpretations which look primarily at the lyrics.

These theories of interpretation are what we always find, theories trying to explain Dylan just by the words.  But lyrics don’t have to mean anything.  Or, alternatively, some of them can mean something but others are just words that fit – and there is nothing wrong with that.

But what we have here is something that gives the clue – for we have, an accompanying band of musicians, who know exactly what to do.  They are not falling over themselves try to get their little bit in.  No, they are controlled, practiced and following the script.

And that starts us on a promising journey.  Yes the “Chinese suit” child could be Brian Jones of the Rolling Stones as some theorists suggest (because “Time is on my side” was the Stones first hit in the US), but such a view still just considers the lyrics, and ignores the music.

But what we have here is a perfect example of the reason why I started this web site – to consider the lyrics and the music together, and to decant whatever meaning I could find from the two together – the recording in its totality, as Dylan presented it to us.

In the case of “I want you” the music has a very obvious descending bass emphasised by the organ’s two note dotted rhythm at the start of each bar from verse two onwards.  (If you don’t see what I mean, and I know I haven’t put it very clearly, listen to verse two, and hear how the organ plays two notes at the start of each line, just as Dylan starts to sing the line.)

What we get in this song is that descending bass, (emphasised by the organ from verse two on), going down one note in the scale with each line.  I’ve written these bass notes for verse one to illustrate this point…

The guilty undertaker sighs (F)
The lonesome organ grinder cries (E)
The silver saxophones say I should refuse you (D, C)
The cracked bells and washed-out horns (B flat)
Blow into my face with scorn (C)
But it’s not that way I wasn’t born(D)
To lose you (C)

I want you, I want you  (F, E)
I want you, so bad (D, C)
Honey, I want you (F)

What is most unusual here is that the song stays almost the same all the way through, line after line.  It does change at the end of line three, but lines four, five and six are again very similar melodically.

And that. combined with the chords changing under the melody, gives us the feeling of progression, especially as when in verse two onwards the organ emphasises the descent.

The question then is, is this just a musical trick – a way of making the song work, or does it have any meaning beyond that?

The Brian Jones notion – the seeing of the guilty undertaker as a real person, the lonesome organ grinder another and and so on, forces us to look for meanings in these images.  But…

But try it this way instead.  Think of these images as passing shadows in a street that is tilting, rather gently downhill.  Maybe you are heading down the hill, and they are in the doorways, or maybe you are in the doorway and they drift by as ghosts, it doesn’t matter.  It is the image of the downhill and the movement that counts.

Keep that vision until in verse one when we get to the cracked bells, where there is a certain resistance.  The melody rises a trifle, although the descending bass descends one more step.  That gives us a tension – like an elastic band being pulled to its final point.  But then in response to the rising melody, the bass takes a step up from B flat to C to D, before finally falling back a little – but by no means all the way, to C – the resting point, the half way house, of a song in F, as this is.   We’ve fallen, bounced back, and are now in balance.

Put another way, the song is a song of slipping downwards, for the first half, and then a resistance, and insistence on not falling eternally down, but of coming back a little to the midpoint.

And why – because these ghosts that pass by in the night are the images of a brain besotted by love and desire – that moment in life when nothing else matters, when rationality slips away and when one would give up anything and everything to have this person.  It is total madness.  It is love.

So in verse one all these crazy images, the guilty undertaker, the lonesome organ grinder, the silver saxophones, the cracked bells, the washed-out horns, they are scornful of his love, but he fights back, stands up and says “No I want this love!” and he gets the music back into the middle balance, ready to fight again.

So the unreason, the emotional turmoil starts again, the drunken politician, the mothers, the sleeping saviours, and the singer… they wait for the descent to stop, he waits for them to stop his hopeless love, (the broken cup) and instead he wants to stand up and open the gate to his love.   And once more we have descended and come back up into balance.

We then have what is known in musical circles as the “middle 8” – the eight bar section that comes after two verses, and which sets a different angle on proceedings.   The singer’s father and grandfather had none of this love nonsense.  They have what in Britain we would call Victorian Values – the way of seeing the world without emotion, a way that dominated the era of Queen Victoria in the 19th century.  (My apologies, I don’t know the American expression for this – perhaps you could enlighten me).

But the women, oh they know the meaning of love, and how they suffered under Victorian values where men kept the stiff upper lip and said nothing of their feelings, because a man did not show emotions.

So the singer goes and talks to the women he knows, and in this descent he holds his own, he is able to use their insights, as they can see right through him – and that’s ok, because it doesn’t matter, once more the verse ends in balance.

So finally the singer faces the world in which he finds himself in love, and he faces down the problems expressed once more in that descending bass line.  And this time as the line rises, the singer finally fights back.  “I did it, though, because he lied, Because he took you for a ride, And because time was on his side”

And at that moment he reaches the high point – he’s acted, and he had to act because time was on his side – time for the singer is running out. If he doesn’t act now all will be lost and he never have his love.

But he gets her, as the quick fade out shows. It is over and done.

I am not saying that Dylan mechanically plotted this movement of image and bass line.  Few songwriters work in such a way.  They play with words, play with lines and just know when it works, although normally can’t explain why.  Why this melody, why this chord change, why this lyric?  Because it works.

And as a melody, bass line and lyric entwined, this works as a battle to deal with the insanity of that deep, overwhelming love, the conquers all.

I must admit when I first heard the song it was a part of the album that I didn’t really care for, there was so much more therein to listen to.  It wasn’t until maybe six months later when I was with a few guys and we were playing the song and trying to make it work at different speeds in different styles that I suddenly realised the importance of the bass line and near repeating melody.

For me, trying to make each phrase equal a particular person doesn’t work at all.  As so often with Dylan the meaning is in the music and the lyrics together.  Apart they don’t work.

What else is on the site?

Untold Dylan contains a review of every Dylan musical composition of which we can find a copy (around 500) and over 300 other articles on Dylan, his work and the impact of his work.

You’ll find an index to our latest posts arranged by themes and subjects on the home page.  You can also see details of our main sections on this site at the top of this page under the picture.

The alphabetical index to the 552 song reviews can be found here.  If you know of anything we have missed please do write in.  The index of the songs in chronological order can be found here.

We also now have a discussion group “Untold Dylan” on Facebook.  Just type the phrase “Untold Dylan” in, on your Facebook page or follow this link 

And please do note   The Bob Dylan Project, which lists every Dylan song in alphabetical order, and has links to licensed recordings and performances by Dylan and by other artists, is starting to link back to our reviews.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 23 Comments

“I wanna be your lover”: the meaning of the music and the lyrics

Recorded October 1965  Review by Tony Attwood

Published on disc 3, Biograph, there is also at least one bootleg version of the song available.  I’m using the Biograph version for this review.

This song is one of the Dylan compositions that emerged during studio work in preparation for the an album – in this case Blonde on Blonde.  Such information as we have from those involved is that one session produced a new arrangement of “Can you Please Crawl out Your Window” and “I Wanna be your lover,” plus “Jet Pilot”. along with “Medicine Sunday”, which apparently later became “Temporary Like Achilles”.

This is a song very much of a style that Bob Dylan favoured at this time – the surreal characters some of whom are references to myths, some to actual people, the racing rhythm, the restriction of the whole piece to just three chords and hardly any melody, the band at full pelt…  

Yes, as soon as you hear it on Biograph you think, “Well the sweet pretty things are in bed now of course…”   It is “Just Like Tom Thumb’s Blues” Mark II.  Even the first two words are the same.  And it was written in the same year.

It also has the twist of having a laugh at the Beatles rather dull composition, “I wanna be your man”.  The lyrics of the Beatles song are truly ordinary…

I wanna be your lover baby
I wanna be your man
I wanna be your lover baby
I wanna be your man
Love you like no other baby
Like no other can
Love you like no other baby
Like no other can

I wanna be your man, I wanna be your man
I wanna be your man, I wanna be your man

Tell me that you love me baby
Let me understand
Tell me that you love me baby
I wanna be your man
I wanna be your lover baby
I wanna be your man
I wanna be your lover baby
I wanna be your man

And so on.

So giving them a twist and a kick and leading those lyrics screaming into some other place with multiple references that Lennon and McCartney would probably never get anyway, seems a good idea which can still be appreciated all these years later.  Adding the surreal looks like fun, and then as a final twist rhyming hers with yerrs (yours) gives it all a nice kick.

And it is a good reminder too that although the Beatles produced some fine tunes, they also produced some rubbish.

What this song does is says, OK, you can have the very simple notion of “I wanna be your lover baby” as the basis for a song, but you don’t have to consider the audience to be a bunch of morons.  What you can do instead is acknowledge that the feeling of desperate and urgent want of a new partner produces all sorts of images and levels of need, and one very good way to express this is not through the mindless repetition of a couple of lines, but some extraordinary invented or mythical characters who flit in and out of vision as the song progresses.

And so off we go…

Well, the rainman comes with his magic wand
And the judge says, “Mona can’t have no bond”
And the walls collide, Mona cries
And the rainman leaves in the wolfman’s disguise

I’m not going to try and explain all the references in this song — not least because I don’t know what “Mona can’t have no bond” means.  But if it is a reference to anything, I guess it is a reference to something from the USA, and being English, there is every chance I have missed it.

However I can take a pitch at the rainman.  The Rainman is a mythical creature in the world of the arts.  The artist (be it musician, dancer, painter whatever) who wants fame from his/her art more than the pleasure and great satisfaction of creating the art itself, offers his soul to the devil via the Rainman who acts as an intermediary.

I wanna be your lover, baby, I wanna be your man
I wanna be your lover, baby
I don’t wanna be hers, I wanna be yours

Well, the undertaker in his midnight suit
Says to the masked man, “Ain’t you cute!”
Well, the masked man he gets up on the shelf
And he says, “You ain’t so bad yourself”

But although I can offer some insights there is no more sense here overall than there is in a painting by Ernst or Dali.  But what this piece and Tom Thumb scream out is the fact that sense doesn’t have to be part of the game – because love, desire, lust are not sensible, logical aspects of human kind.  That is why this song, and even more so, Tom Thumb, work so well.

I have no idea what Dylan is saying in relation to the undertaker and the masked man, but it really doesn’t matter.  The characters continue to pour out of the lyrics…

Well, jumpin’ Judy can’t go no higher
She had bullets in her eyes, and they fire
Rasputin he’s so dignified
He touched the back of her head an’ he died

Jumpin’ Judy however I do know.  Jumpin’ Judy is a character from a song recorded by John and Alan Lomax in 1933 when they visited prison farms in the South of the USA, believing they might find songs that went back to the time of slavery.

They didn’t find such songs, but found new songs, sung by the prisoners, of which what became one of the most famous was Jumpin Judy.  They recorded this at Parchman Farm in the Mississippi Delta.  You may well have heard the Georgie Fame or John Mayall singing a version of “Parchman Farm” itself – another song that arose in these recording sessions.

Moving on…

Grigori Yefimovich Rasputin (1869 – 1916) was the Russian mystic who inveigled himself with Russian royalty, particularly Tsar Nicolas II – to no great benefit to the Russian people.

Then we come to “Phaedra with her looking glass”.  I wonder, should we worry about individual references like – or indeed like Rasputin in the previous verse or Jumpin Judy?   I’ve no idea really if Dylan meant them other than as characters – and in the end I think there is no need for there to be a deeper reference.  But just in case you want to know…

Phaedra was married to Theseus, but fell in love with Theseus’ son Hippolytus.  Meanwhile Hippolytus rejected Aphrodite in order to remain faithful to Artemis.  So annoyed was Aphrodite at his rejection that he made Phaedra fall in love with him.  (The Greek myths can sometimes make Dylan’s surreal period songs seem quite obvious and straightforward!)

Well, Phaedra with her looking glass
Stretchin’ out upon the grass
She gets all messed up and she faints –
That’s ’cause she’s so obvious and you ain’t

Yes its fun, it’s knockabout, its surreal, its three chords, and no real attempt at a melody.

And why not?  It’s a damn sight more interesting than “I wanna be your man”.

Index to the songs

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Forever Young: the meaning of the music and the lyrics

By Tony Attwood, updated 12 October 2017

This is one of two reviews of this song on the site.  There is a link to the second review at the end of this piece.


 

This is another Dylan song which he has suggested was written in a short time – but there are occasions when he seems to suggest it took him some time to get it as he wanted.

The song was, by Dylan’s admission written for Jesse Dylan (born 1966), but the problem with the piece was that Dylan couldn’t work out whether it was a folksy number, a fast rock number or a slow more gentle piece.

My view, for what it is worth, is that even when he recorded the famous slow number he still wasn’t quite sure, and for that reason (very much in my opinion as a musician, not because I have any special insight) he got the chorus wrong, turning it into a big dramatic moment, when it would have been much more effective as a gentle refrain, almost singing the young lad to sleep.

Because of that problem (for me) it is a song that sounds much better in my head than it seems to on the recordings I have.  In coming to write this one Wednesday evening at home, I started playing the version on The Essential Bob Dylan, which is the version that starts really well, but just seems to get carried away with itself after the first two verses.

I then tried the other copies I have – one on Biograph which is the folksy 1973 demo version, and then the At Budokan version which has the problem of the Essential version, only a lot more so.

And I suppose because I tend to think about poets like Keats at the drop of a hat, I did think of Keats listening to these three versions over and over as I came to write this.  In particular

Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard are sweeter

It comes from the poem which continues with the lines…

More happy love, more happy, happy love! Forever warm and still to be enjoyed, forever panting and for ever young.

In this poem Keats is expressing a love that will last forever unlike mortal love that eventually fades and vanishes, which pretty much seems to me where Dylan is coming from.

One oddity I did notice was how Dylan has performed the song in two different keys – which is quite unusual.  The version most of us know, the one that I am calling the “Essential” version is in D, making it very easy for everyone to play.  For some reason the other two versions are in F sharp.  I really can’t quite see why.

And, while we are on oddities, here is another.  Dylan is reported to have said that at the time of writing Forever Young he was looking for a response to Neil Young’s “Heart of Gold” – a song which some said sounded more like Dylan than Dylan and which Dylan didn’t like.

I can sympathise with Dylan not liking it, although generally I am a great Neil Young fan. But really was “Forever Young” a response?  Was the use of the word “Young” a gentle bit of fun with Neil Young’s name?  Maybe, but if it were, it is hardly profound.

Anyway, here is what Dylan said,

‘The only time it bothered me that someone sounded like me was when I was living in Phoenix, Arizona, in about ’72 and the big song at the time was “Heart of Gold.” I used to hate it when it came on the radio. I always liked Neil Young, but it bothered me every time I listened to “Heart of Gold.” I think it was up at number one for a long time, and I’d say, “Shit, that’s me. If it sounds like me, it should as well be me”.’

Maybe that was just one of Bob’s little jokes.

As for the music, this is another one of those songs where Dylan makes perfect, perfect use of the descending bass. Listen to the song afresh, and just try and hear what the bass does.  It is exactly how it should be…

May God bless and keep you always
May your wishes all come true
May you always do for others
And let others do for you –

The singing of these opening four lines and the accompaniment are absolutely spot on in every regard – I could listen to this all night.  But we only get a few moments of it, because when we get to “May you build a ladder to the stars” the organist takes the word “stars” as a trigger for all sorts of twinkling sounds which really are far too obvious and ultimately for me extremely frustrating.  I don’t need any silly musical games.  Like I said, it sounds better in my head with no organ.

And then we get to the chorus, and Bob lets go, which is a shame.  All the previous delicacy, already undermined by the organ’s twinkles, is now completely lost.

Dylan recovers for the start of verse two

May you grow up to be righteous 
May you grow up to be true
May you always know the truth

But then as we get to the “lights surrounding you” so everyone wants to do a fill in, following the organ’s lead in the earlier verse, and all delicacy is thrown overboard.

There is a story that a young woman came into the studio and heard this slow version felt Bob was turning into an old man and told him so.

Heylin reports this with the comment to Bob that he should always “ignore the opinionated outsider!”   On reading it I couldn’t help but feel that such a comment could be made of much that Heylin says.  But yes, here he does have a point.

Forever Young, I think most people agree, is a beautiful, beautiful simple song with an elegant melody and delightful words from a father to his son.  I don’t think the arrangements we have do it justice, but of course with Bob you take what you get.

I guess I’m lucky.  I can sit down and play it on the piano, singing along, and try and get close to the version that I can hear in my head.  No one else hears me, no one else knows.

It works for me.

You’ll find the second review of the song here

What else is on the site

1: Over 400 reviews of Dylan songs.  There is an index to these in alphabetical order on the home page, and an index to the songs in the order they were written in the Chronology Pages.

2: The Chronology.  We’ve taken all the songs we can find recordings of and put them in the order they were written (as far as possible) not in the order they appeared on albums.  The chronology is more or less complete and is now linked to all the reviews on the site.  We have also recently started to produce overviews of Dylan’s work year by year.     The index to the chronologies is here.

3: Bob Dylan’s themes.  We publish a wide range of articles about Bob Dylan and his compositions.  There is an index here.

4:   The Discussion Group    We now have a discussion group “Untold Dylan” on Facebook.  Just type the phrase “Untold Dylan” in, on your Facebook page or follow this link 

5:  Bob Dylan’s creativity.   We’re fascinated in taking the study of Dylan’s creative approach further.  The index is in Dylan’s Creativity.

6: You might also like: A classification of Bob Dylan’s songs and partial Index to Dylan’s Best Opening Lines

And please do note   The Bob Dylan Project, which lists every Dylan song in alphabetical order, and has links to licensed recordings and performances by Dylan and by other artists, is starting to link back to our reviews

Posted in Uncategorized | 15 Comments

You Angel You: The meaning of the music and the lyrics

“His fans had already had enough of this kind of song,” says Clinton Heylin.

Not this fan.

But then I suspect I start from a quite different point of view.  And really that’s the problem with a critic like Heylin when he moves from the extraordinary task of trawling through all the notebooks, all the concerts and every interview to piece together Dylan’s life.  When he says that in a notebook this changed was made in crayon, and that in a certain concert 30 years ago this song was suddenly introduced with a variant second verse, we all believe him, because he is not normally found to be in error.

However when he slips seamlessly from that approach to one in which he seeks to speak for Dylan’s fans en masse and to comment on their reactions as if they were uniform, he is misleading.  He can’t possibly know.  He can present evidence about sales of course, and concert attendances, but otherwise there is no measure of the ordinary fan who buys some of the albums, maybe goes to some of the concerts, likes this, doesn’t like that…

Of course many critics do try to speak for those who they have never met and opinions they have not gathered.  That’s not the problem – it is the problem of mixing reports that can be backed up with evidence (the notebooks, recordings etc) with personal judgement set out as fact.

And Heylin’s got it very wrong here with his generalisation in “Revolution in the Air”.  I like this song, and so do quite a few other people I know.  He may not, fair enough, but I wish he wouldn’t try to speak for me.

For me Dylan is an exquisite songwriter who loves to experiment with all sorts of different formats and styles.  He virtually invented the “songs of disdain” like Rolling Stone and rock as a surreal adventure as in  Visions of Johanna.  Plus he’s been to protest, religion in pop, travelled through “Songs of my leaving”, given us “songs of despair”  “Love found and lost”…

And he also meandered into nursery rhymes, did a lot of blues, and wrote straight pop songs like this and the crazy songs like Quinn the Eskimo.  And why not?

What, after all, is wrong with diversity of genres?

True there is a lot of half baked pop around, and some of it has become rather popular.  Yes, I can do without Chubby Checker singing “Let’s Twist Again”, not just because it is a boring little song, but also because I don’t want to watch a fat man waddling on stage.  But I can enjoy, and indeed I have enjoyed performing everything from “Peggy Sue Got Married” to “The Way You Look Tonight”. just as I’ve enjoyed listening to it, and indeed dancing to it.

So what is wrong with You Angel You?

Well apparently Dylan dismissed in 1985 as having “dummy lyrics” – and yes they are straightforward pop lyrics but even when Dylan is doing straightforward pop he gives us a surprise that most other people can’t risk in such a straight song, as with the “more and more and more…”

So Dylan didn’t like it and thought it too obvious and simple – but it has a superb tune.  Played in A and just using A D and E chords, what it does is use the descending bass line that Dylan employs in so many songs with probably more effect than in any other single.  It doesn’t always work but oh it certainly works here.

Just listen to the single line

The way you walk and the way you talk

Now try and pick out what the bass does.  It is simplicity, it fits, it is perfection.

But there is one thing is wrong.  For although the bass works and indeed works well throughout, overall the accompaniment from The Band does not.  It is not the redeeming feature, as Heylin suggests, but the failure of the session.  The problem is the whole recording is totally under rehearsed.  Dylan makes a vocal mistake at the start, but leaves it in the recording, perhaps telling us he doesn’t care for the song (fair enough, it’s his song). but then everyone wants in, the organ comes in with extended runs when it ought to be holding chords, the lead guitar is uninspired, the piano tries and tries and tries to push in and get a bit of airtime, and in the end everyone falls over everyone else and no one bothers to call a re-take or at the very least mix it properly.  And no one (apart from the bassist) has a clue what to do with “more and more and more”

It is the Band, and the truth is they sound like they are not used to this type of song, and it seems they didn’t seem to have a chance to get used to it.  Just listen to the fade out muddle.  It’s horrible.

Then go back and compare with the opening introduction and first verse which is balanced and controlled.   But the descent of the recording is quick, meaning most of this song is a musical muddle.  Indeed even the official Dylan site does not reflect the recording’s version of the words which is odd.

What I think Dylan sings is

You angel you 
You got me under your wing
The way you walk and the way you talk [note the descending bass]
I feel I could almost sing.

You angel you 
You’re as fine as anything’s fine
I just want to watch you talk 
With your memory on my mind

And oh I can’t sleep at night for trying.  [This is where the musicians start fighting each other for space]

And so on as it declines into a horrible messy instrumental and its down hill all the way.  And what a shame because it is in reality a really good pop song.

See the full list of reviews

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Every Grain of Sand: the meaning of the music and the lyrics

by Tony Attwood

Updated 19 October with a few changes and this link to newly released version – here it is

Every Grain of Sand” is one of the few songs that Dylan has described in terms of writing – he reports that it came to him in one go and that was it.  No editing, no tortured weeks of trying to make it work – it just was.

Almost every artist in every art form has events like this, as well as the the opposite – the works or parts of a work that simply will not come out right.  The artist knows in a holistic way how it should work, but the details just won’t come through.  We tend to know artists not by the fact that they exclusively create work without preliminaries (or vice versa) but whether they  tend towards one approach or the other.

If we think of Dylan we might think of Blind Willy McTell as a song that Dylan felt wasn’t ready, or indeed Caribbean Wind which might seem to be completely there to us, but not quite in Dylan’s view.

For this song, Dylan had an immediate influence and inspiration with William Blake’s “Auguries of Innocence”

To see a world in a grain of sand,
And a heaven in a wild flower,
Hold infinity in the palm of your hand,
And eternity in an hour

Throughout this site there are a number of articles linking Dylan to William Blake, which you might like to take in… for example

Of course Dylan doesn’t comment directly on such things.  All we have from Dylan is a comment in an interview about being influenced by Keats which is thought by many commentators to be a deliberately off-putting line for a journalist.  Although we found something a bit deeper: Blake, Keats, And Spots Of Ink: Spinning Reels Of Rhyme

Apart from the fact that the song came to Dylan quickly, we don’t how Dylan wrote this song; words first, music first, at the piano, on guitar…? But what I notice is that it is in E flat – which is a very unusual key for him.  And this I suspect is a major point – a point perhaps missed in other commentaries.  

Every songwriter gets into habits – just as we all have habits within our speech.  We tend to use certain words and certain phrases far more often that other phrases, and we’re each different in this regard.   In songwriting each writer has his/her own favourite turns of phrase, melodic moments, chord changes etc.  But there are two extra influences – the instrument the songwriter was using as the song was composed, and the key.

The key you write in affects two things – how the melody line that you can sing fits within the song (in that you might be able to sing one melody in C but not in G, because of the range), and how the guitar or keyboard feels playing the chords that you write.

But this second point works backwards too.  Most songwriters admit that songs come out differently for them, according to the key.

If I play in G major I’m immediately tempted into the G, Em, C, D routine.  In E flat major I start to rotate between E flat A flat and B flat, often holding the E flat note in the bass as an underlying point of reference.  And that is exactly what Dylan does here.  There are only three chords in the whole song – everything musically comes out of the melody, and that happened, I believe, because Dylan uses E flat so rarely and because he was writing at the piano.

It is, in short, a beautiful and unique melody set over the simplest of chord sequences, and I suspect this was achieved by playing in a key that Dylan rarely uses.  

But there is more, for the fact that it closes the Shot of Love album seems utterly appropriate; it is a statement of where one is.  That simple set of chords closes off the whole album but that change to a new key announces a new start.

So where is it spiritually?  Of course it can be read as a Christian text.  It has a confession, and Cain, knowing exactly what he has to do next…

But hang on… what Cain did was kill his brother.  So what is Dylan going to do?  Cain as a reference point to the future doesn’t seem too hopeful or too Christian to me.

To understand this we perhaps need to know what the “dying voice within me reaching out somewhere” is actually reaching out to.  OK, he is in despair and in despair some people turn to an all encompassing religion.  But looking back we might recall that Dylan became a Christian in 1978 or thereabouts, and Shot of Love was 1981.  After that we get Infidels, generally agreed to be a return to his pre-Christian vision of life.  It all seems to suggest, like the key of E flat, an ending of one era, but an opening of a door on the next.

Equally though we might start arguing that Every Grain of Sand is not a religious song at all, but a song of despair about religion.

But, the contrary argument could be made, what about…

“In the fury of the moment I can see the Master’s hand
In every leaf that trembles, in every grain of sand”

and my reply is that yes this could be The Master as God, except that God gave mankind free will to choose to worship Him or not, to choose one road or the other, and look what Cain did with that freedom.

If it is Christian imagery it is convoluted and obscure, in my view, and not what Blake was talking about at all.  But there is another way through this, to step aside from Christian imagery and see this as more a Taoist vision.  Here the Master is not God or Jesus, but a master in the sense of a teacher.  One who has mastered the arts of meditation.  A swami.  A Lao Tsu character – depending how you want to see him.

I would argue that in the second verse (and I take this song as having three verses not the six four liners as sometimes printed) there is little specifically Christian but there is everything to do with inward reflection and consideration.   Yes, temptation is a Christian concept, but it appears in all philosophies.  Where there is the notion of the free mind there is the choice of what to do – and temptation can always be there.  But that notion in itself does not have to lead on to saying that this is temptation placed by the Devil.  In the way Dylan writes, it could just be circumstance.

If I may, let me invite you to read that second verse…

Oh, the flowers of indulgence and the weeds of yesteryear
Like criminals, they have choked the breath of conscience and good cheer
The sun beat down upon the steps of time to light the way
To ease the pain of idleness and the memory of decay
I gaze into the doorway of temptation’s angry flame
And every time I pass that way I always hear my name
Then onward in my journey I come to understand
That every hair is numbered like every grain of sand

Blake wrote “We are led to believe a lie” and I think this beautiful reflective song has this notion at its heart.  Just consider the lines.

Sometimes I turn, there’s someone there, other times it’s only me
I am hanging in the balance of the reality of man

To me these are not Christian questions, but questions from a man who is interested in a much deeper philosophy that asks questions relating to the very nature of man without having the God-given certainty of the answers.

Of course you may say, “Does it matter?” because it is an utterly beautiful song whichever way you read it, and that’s fair enough.  But if one does want to explore the meanings, I think there are many alternatives here.  Dylan is gazing into the doorway, not just of temptation, but of his own future.

What else is on the site

1: Over 400 reviews of Dylan songs.  There is an index to these in alphabetical order on the home page, and an index to the songs in the order they were written in the Chronology Pages.

2: The Chronology.  We’ve taken all the songs we can find recordings of and put them in the order they were written (as far as possible) not in the order they appeared on albums.  The chronology is more or less complete and is now linked to all the reviews on the site.  We have also recently started to produce overviews of Dylan’s work year by year.     The index to the chronologies is here.

3: Bob Dylan’s themes.  We publish a wide range of articles about Bob Dylan and his compositions.  There is an index here.

4:   The Discussion Group    We now have a discussion group “Untold Dylan” on Facebook.  Just type the phrase “Untold Dylan” in, on your Facebook page or follow this link 

5:  Bob Dylan’s creativity.   We’re fascinated in taking the study of Dylan’s creative approach further.  The index is in Dylan’s Creativity.

6: You might also like: A classification of Bob Dylan’s songs and partial Index to Dylan’s Best Opening Lines

And please do note   The Bob Dylan Project, which lists every Dylan song in alphabetical order, and has links to licensed recordings and performances by Dylan and by other artists, is starting to link back to our reviews

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 14 Comments

“Masters of War”; the meaning of the music and the lyrics

Masters of War is always officially cited as being written by Dylan, but although the lyrics are totally original, as indeed is the accompaniment, the melody is not.

If one was starting from scratch in investigating this song the clue to it not being a Dylan tune comes from the fact that it is not in a major or minor key, as is (I think) every original Dylan melody, but is in the Dorian Mode.

Now what follows is the technical music stuff – if you are not into the issue of how music actually works, you might want to skip these next few paragraphs.

But to explain, in case you are interested – western music from the 16th century onwards has for the most part (at least until the avant garde of the 20th century) been written in either major or minor keys.   Even if you are not a musician you can probably recognise a piece in a minor key because to us it always sounds sad. If you want to get the feel of a major key against a minor key play C, E and G together on the piano.   Then to hear the feel of a minor key play C, E flat and G together.

Prior to the 16th century there were not just two types of scale (major and minor)  but seven, with each having its own secondary variation (which I won’t bore you with).  Two of these seven became our major and minor keys.  The rest have faded away, but one of these seven is still occasionally used: the Dorian Mode.

If you want to hear what it sounds like (apart from listening to Masters of War, or its original versions,) you can go to a piano and play the white notes from D up to the next D:

D, E, F, G, A, B, C, D

A tune created around those notes, and only those notes, is in the Dorian Mode.  Masters of War is one such tune, although what I think Dylan did on the original recording is put a capo on the guitar, so it is actually sounding three semi-tones higher.  But that doesn’t change the relationship between the notes.

OK, that’s all the technical stuff.

The song – the melody in the Dorian Mode –  is “Nottamun Town,” an ancient traditional English song, which was collected and then arranged by Jean Ritchie.  Ms Ritchie subsequently protested about Dylan’s use of the song, and appears to have reached a settlement with Dylan, which presumably means or meant she received royalties from it.

As for the lyrics of Nottamun Town, it is surreal.   What most people who have an interest in English folksong know best is the opening

As I rode out in Nottamun Town
Not a soul would look up, not a soul would look down
Not a soul would look up, not a soul would look down
To show me the way to fair Nottamun Town

But that opening verse only gives a hint of the bizarre surrealism of the song

When I got there no one did I see
They all stood around me just looking at me
I called for a cup to drive gladness away
And stifle the dust for it rained the whole day

It carries on later

Sat down on a hard hot cold frozen stone
Ten thousand stood round me yet I was alone
I took off my hat to keep my head warm
Ten thousand was drowned that never was born

That last line sounds so Dylan that it is self-evident that he knew this song.  Indeed it spread from the English East Midlands (where I live) and where it can still be heard in folk clubs, and indeed where all the regulars know it and will join in if it is performed, across to north America.  It comes from a tradition of surreal confused words and meanings within English literature that stretches back 1000 years.

Dylan transmutes the chaotic nature of the original, perhaps launching from the “ten thousand” line into a piece about the arms industry – and about the fact that war is the game old men play with young men’s lives.

After a lifetime of knowing Masters of War, and including many years of never hearing it (but still being able to recite it line by line, even though today I can’t successfully learn the lines to the songs I write) it is as powerful as ever.  I guess for a long time in my life I just knew it too well, and with a growing family of my own it was not what I wanted to listen to.

However today, listening to it again, strangely the same single couplet comes back to haunt as it did when I first heard it.

For even Jesus would never
Forgive what you do

If you’ve read my earlier commentaries you will know I am not a Christian, but I have always found that a remarkable line.  I’ve rambled on enough recently about my religious feelings, so I won’t do it again but will just say, I find that such a remarkable couplet that I have thought about many times over the years.

It is of course not the only Christian reference – there’s Judas, and “All the money you made, Will never buy back your soul,”

Of course as I have grown from a teenager and seen my own children grow and develop and have their own families nothing has changed.  The military industry is still out there.  Communism has mostly gone but Russia threatens the EU – the union members bound by the vision that an attack on one of them Ukraine, is an attack on them all.  And as the Islamic State rises (as I write this) still nothing has changed in terms of war.

And so, borrowed tune though it is, this is surely one of the most haunting songs ever written.

I just want you to know
I can see through your masks

Oh yes.

Index to songs

Posted in Uncategorized | 11 Comments

Gotta Serve Somebody

By Tony Attwood

If I am asked for a simple explanation as to why I like Dylan’s music so much, and why it has been part of my life since my teens and onwards for some 50 years, I answer, “it is the metaphor.”

Metaphor, I say, is the key to the language. It gives us the chance to fly.  Folk uses it a bit, but it has never really been central to rock – until Dylan.

“All the world’s a stage,” I conclude, and leave it at that.

And what do we have in “Gotta Serve Somebody?”  Nothing – at least nothing in terms of metaphor.  Indeed there is an absolute absence of metaphor.  The answer is not blowing in the wind – there is no wind, nothing is blowing, the world is not a stage, it is what it is, here is the answer, no arguing allowed.

So this may be a song for you but it is not a song for me, because it avoids the very essence of what draws me to Dylan.

Plus I must admit there is the fact that I utterly disagree with the sentiment.  My position (for what it is worth, and I’m just a guy who writes stuff) is that I’m perfectly happy for believers to get on with their lives as long as they allow me to get on with mine without interference.

Living in England of course I don’t have that, for I live in a country in which the Bishops sit in Parliament influencing laws on things like divorce, the right to die and whether my local supermarket can open all day on sunday (it can’t), because of their religious beliefs.  But that’s another matter.  I don’t serve the Lord of this song, for if I serve anyone it is my family, and people in general.  I just try to be a nice guy.

So yes it is quite true, I don’t like the sentiment of the song, and I admit that.  But far, far more than that, take the metaphor out of Dylan, remove the exciting chord changes and the interesting melody lines, and I have to say you don’t have Dylan.  You have a very average songwriter.

“Gotta Serve Somebody” arrived as the opening to the 1979 album Slow Train Coming.  Quite strangely (in my opinion) the song won the Grammy Award for Best Rock Vocal Performance by a Male in 1979.  It was even a hit single.  I find all that quite  incomprehensible.

Now although I am not a Christian, and indeed I am an atheist, I have tried to understand the dominant religion in my country, and of course I am aware of “No man can serve two masters” in St Matthew.  I am also aware of Leviticus in the Old Testament, but Bob didn’t seem to want to know about that at this stage in his life, even though the OT is still very much part of the Christian understanding of God.

But my goodness he was committed to the song after he recorded it, singing it as the opener for every one of over 100 shows between 1979 and 1981.

Dylan was indeed preaching – for there is surely nothing here apart from the preaching over a modest backing track.  I am not sure I would go as far as the readers of Rolling Stone in voting it the second worst Dylan song – I’d have to think long and hard about that.  Rather I’d say it is just, well, a very ordinary song that bops along and tries to make up in background what it lacks in foreground.  And not too successfully.

And the reason for that, in my view, relates to the subject matter.  For the point about religious belief is that you don’t have to argue it – you just believe it.  So there is no debate.  There is no metaphor beyond God is the Light.  But no matter how much I think about it, I still prefer “All the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players.”

Musically what we have is a song in A minor and largely based around that chord for the four lines of the verse.  The chorus moves to D major, back to A minor and then quickly through E, D and back to A minor.  Nothing there to grab the imagination.

But as I listen to it several times over in writing this little piece what strikes me is the horrible sameness of it all.  It is quite a nice sound as a backing track – but it needs really exciting lyrics over the top to make it work.  But there is nothing unexpected in the chorus; there is a fair enough tune, but it just goes round and round and nothing happens.

What I am reminded of most of all is the comment by Talking Heads, in the song Heaven.  “Heaven is a place where nothing ever happens.”  Dylan seems to have got that idea and wants to write it in a song, forgetting that David Byrne was being ironic at the time.

When this kiss is over it will start again.
It will not be any different, it will be exactly the same.
It’s hard to imagine that nothing at all
could be so exciting, could be so much fun.

Heaven, Heaven is a place, place where nothing, nothing ever happens…

That’s David Byrne for you.  Interestingly both “Heaven” and “Gotta serve” were issued in the same year.  I’ve often wondered if either artist heard the other’s work before writing his reply.

Either way David Byrne made the point that because Heaven is perfection, and because perfection cannot be changed, it is always the same, and thus Heaven is ultimately boring because nothing ever happens because it is the home of eternal perfection.  The perfect circle.

And it is almost as if Dylan has heard this and accepted it as how it should be, because in Dylan’s song nothing happens.  But it should, because his song is set on earth…

You may be an ambassador to England or France You may like to gamble, you might like to dance You may be the heavyweight champion of the world You may be a socialite with a long string of pearls

Yes, I say, but so what?  Well the what is, “You have to serve somebody” and that’s it.  As David Byrne said, “Say it once, say it again.”

And that’s what Bob does with the chorus…

But you’re gonna have to serve somebody, yes indeed You’re gonna have to serve somebody Well, it may be the devil or it may be the Lord But you’re gonna have to serve somebody

OK Bob I hear you. I disagree profoundly, but I will not ever dispute your absolute right to say it.  I like to choose not to listen any more, except you give me that chorus seven times.  Seven times Bob, the same thing, seven times.  “You’ve got a lot of nerve” Bob to give me that same rather ordinary chorus seven times.

You see Bob, and you know this perfectly well, if you are going to do this preaching, you have to be interesting.  It’s fine if you are talking to a believer, but I think you really believed you were going to convert some people.  But really, in retrospect did you ever think you were going to influence anyone with a verse like this….

You might be a rock ’n’ roll addict prancing on the stage You might have drugs at your command, women in a cage You may be a businessman or some high-degree thief They may call you Doctor or they may call you Chief

If I go on any more I’m going to be as dull as the song.  I’ll stop but with one final comment.

Lest you think that my atheism is so all pervading that I am against this just because it is a religious song, and that I could never like any religious music or any music with a religious message let me assure you that is not so.  As it happens I’ve performed in a variety of concerts of religious music, from the B Minor Mass down, as well as having played the church organ in religious services including at two of my daughters’ Christian weddings.  The association with religion doesn’t worry me.  It is just that this song has nothing but a statement of belief.

Compare and contrast with “I believe in you” or indeed with David Byrne’s “Heaven”.

Index to all the reviews

Posted in Uncategorized | 13 Comments

On a night like this

by Tony Attwood

Clinton Heylin calls On a night like this “anodyne”, but he’s never been a songwriter.  If he had he would know it is as hard to write a memorable bouncy love song as it is to write “Like a Rolling Stone”.

The problem is that eight billion previous versions of “tonight it is a special night” have been written before.   Even more bouncy tunes have been written around four chords (five if you include the extra chord in the middle 8).

Here it is

https://vimeo.com/381447648

And most of them you won’t even want to listen to to the bitter end.

The problem for the songwriter is also that you have maybe 500 words to play with, you have a melody that the listener is going to hear four times during the course of the song, and you still have to make it listenable and memorable rather than irritating or instantly forgettable.  But equally it needs to be catchy, so that phrases of music and lyrical phrases can be remembered readily by the audience.

What makes this song so much worse than some of the 12 bar blues that Dylan has recorded?  To my mind nothing at all  – he turns his hand to a different type of song, and being the supreme songwriter he is, he makes it work.  Many of his blues are interesting, but not that special.  This is an interesting and memorable pop song to my mind.

Additionally, the concept of the lyrics is fairly unusual – the lady comes round, seemingly by surprise, in the depths of winter, the singer is delighted, they go to bed, as they have done once before.  Everyone’s happy.  Hardly War and Peace, but still not the usual love or lost love concepts that dominate pop music.  As a positive take on casual sex it is rather unusual.  How many songs can you think of that say, “hey nice to see you, nice to go to bed together” without professing love or lust?  There are some, but not so many.

What also makes it fun is the fact that although it is a pop song, Dylan sneaks in the unexpected.  For example, “burn, burn, burn” comes from Kerouac’s masterpiece, “On the Road” – a regular influence on Dylan of course.

Here’s the full quote

“the only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars.” 

So what do we have but Dylan being that burn burn burn person in a suburban setting.  A fascinating idea, and one that he pulls off.  Indeed it is done so casually that if you don’t really listen to the lyrics it is easy to miss.

And there’s the sudden end of romance in the “middle 8” when having got the woman into bed he stops all the elegance of his seduction and goes for

There is plenty a room for all
So please don’t elbow me

Of course I’ve never played this song over and over as I have done with Desolation Row, Johanna, Not Dark Yet etc etc, but just because it isn’t in the style of the greatest of Dylan’s masterpieces we should not, in my view, reject it.  Even Picasso did lots of drawings of what he saw, just for the doing of them.  Not every painting was Guernica, but it doesn’t make many of the prints any less worth keeping and viewing.

Part of Dylan’s supremacy as a songwriter is that he has reached out to every corner of contemporary music, from the nursery rhyme to the epic, from the songs of disdain to pop, and he achieves something unique in each case.

Here’s he’s proving that even with a song format that has been hammered to death he can still play with the lyrics, and give us something to think about along the way.

The song opens “Planet Waves”.  It compacts its storyline into under three minutes.  In terms of the miniature that it is, it is superb.

Index to all the songs reviewed

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Up to Me. An astounding Dylan masterpiece left on the shelf

By Tony Attwood

“Up to Me” is one of those songs that if you didn’t know it, and you were suddenly find it on Biograph or an out-take album you would probably start by thinking “hey this is just Tangled up in Blue again” and then as you hear the lyrics, you would more than likely realise you have found a total absolute gem.

Similar to Tangled, and indeed with elements of Simple Twist of Fate and some of Shelter From the Storm, but of huge value in its own right.

In short, if you don’t know this piece, but you have enjoyed Blood on the Tracks go and get an album with it on now.   Biograph is the obvious place to  try.  Or “More Blood More Tracks”

The rotating chord sequence E B A / E B A is interesting in itself as it is interrupted in the third line by the unexpected change to B E A, but with the vocal line not moving  from its pre-ordained routine.  If you appreciate the subtleties you are hearing in this chord changes it can catch you out in each and every verse the first couple of times you hear the piece.

The accompaniment is “Dylan-calm” – Dylan the old story teller, just looking back on the past with a shrug of the shoulders.  We also have a double bass style that has become familiar through the songs mentioned above, a beautiful restrained style that adds enormously to the overall context of the song.

But what is so shockingly different here is the opening.  OK – this is an out-take, and maybe not the best recording available, or maybe never intended to be the final version, but it just starts, musically and lyrically.  Bang, you are in.  No preliminaries.

And lyrically there is no, “They sat together in the park”.   There is no “Early one morning the sun was shining.”  There is, in short, no placement of the characters at all.  No warm up, no opening chords, just a sudden start.  And what a start…

“Everything went from bad to worse, money never changed a thing”

And we think, “what the hell is going on here?”   This is doom and gloom, but the music doesn’t represent that at all.  Even lines like “Death kept following, tracking us down” are sung in the same “Tangled” style.

This opening however does set a scene of its own, once you have heard the song several times.   Everything has gone wrong, and wrong again, and I ain’t got much time left to sort this out.  But no one else is going to resolve anything, so it is up to me.

That’s the song – but such a simplified reduction does not do it any justice at all.

There are some wonderful lines in this song delivered by Dylan with a bounce and emphasis that shows a tremendous level of crafting.   Just listen to

“If I’d thought about it I never would’ve done it, I guess I would’ve let it slide”

and

“If I’d lived my life by what others were thinkin’, the heart inside me would’ve died”

and

“I was just too stubborn to ever be governed by enforced insanity”

I love that internal rhyme in that last line.

These lines just pile on top of each other, and drive us along in the whirlwind that the singer explores.   Indeed some of these lines are utterly classic Dylan, which makes is so sad that they exist on a song so few people know.

“I’ve only got me one good shirt left and it smells of stale perfume”

How many evocative images do you want in one line?

And then

“In fourteen months I’ve only smiled once and I didn’t do it consciously”

Yes, you could build whole novels around each of these lines.  But for me the key to the explanation of what the song is all about comes with the line

“The old Rounder in the iron mask slipped me the master key”

The old Rouder, I take to be, a person up to no good, the dissolute man, the wastrel.  In an iron mask, not showing his true self, pretending to be one thing while being another.  It is a term you often find in old blue grass music.

The woman of whom Dylan is singing is, I guess, higher class than he, and he’s unable to follow her – that is the rub.  So when she is tricked away by the Rounder, he can’t follow.

“Well, I watched you slowly disappear down into the officers’ club

I would’ve followed you in the door but I didn’t have a ticket stub”

So either she’s moved up in the world and he’s tagging along – or she was always from that world.  Maybe she was a film star, or something…  But he certainly wasn’t…

"Oh, the only decent thing I did when I worked as a postal clerk"

Was to haul your picture down off the wall near the cage where I used to work

Was I a fool or not to try to protect your identity?

You looked a little burned out, my friend, I thought it might be up to me"

 

Put another way, “I’m just a regular guy trying to help you – but if you go back to your old world, beware, because there are some tricky guys out there.”

“Well, I met somebody face to face and I had to remove my hat

She’s everything I need and love but I can’t be swayed by that”

The working man, doffing his cap.with the everyday philosophy of the man of the road.

We heard the Sermon on the Mount and I knew it was too complex

It didn’t amount to anything more than what the broken glass reflects

When you bite off more than you can chew you pay the penalty

Somebody’s got to tell the tale, I guess it must be up to me

 

As for the rest of the crew, the suspicion that they are the sophisticates, and the singer is just the postman comes with the names…

“Well, Dupree came in pimpin’ tonight to the Thunderbird Café”

There are, incidentally, Thunderbird Cafes everywhere

“So go on, boys, and play your hands, life is a pantomime

The ringleaders from the county seat say you don’t have all that much time

And the girl with me behind the shades, she ain’t my property

One of us has got to hit the road, I guess it must be up to me”

The ol Rounder will hit the road not the sophisticate

As the song ends we have the ultimate Dylan farewell – I don’t want to print those lines as I don’t want to spoil it for you if you haven’t yet heard the song..  It is “And if I pass this way again, you can rest assured” only with even greater feeling.

We touch these people and know a little of their lives… this is the short story form in literature transmuted into a popular song, and it is brilliant.

How could this recording have been made, and then just left?   For anyone else it would be the summit of a career.  For Dylan it is an out-take.  He has never performed it in public.  It just is.

And it kills me every time I have the strength to put it on.

What else is on the site

You’ll find an index to our latest posts arranged by themes and subjects on the home page.  You can also see details of our main sections on this site at the top of this page under the picture.

The index to the 500+ Dylan compositions reviewed is now on a new page of its own.  You will find it here.  It contains reviews of every Dylan composition that we can find a recording of – if you know of anything we have missed please do write in.

We also have a discussion group “Untold Dylan” on Facebook.  Just type the phrase “Untold Dylan” in, on your Facebook page or follow this link 

And please do note   The Bob Dylan Project, which lists every Dylan song in alphabetical order, and has links to licensed recordings and performances by Dylan and by other artists, is starting to link back to our reviews

Posted in Uncategorized | 34 Comments

My back pages

In 1965 Dylan made a comment to the effect that he used to know what he wanted to write about before starting a song, but that since then he has taken a different route.  The implication is that he started writing and let the song itself direct where matters were going.

In this comment Dylan notes the two opposing routes between which all creative artists make a choice – plotting and planning the work (in whatever form it is) before one starts, or letting it happen.

I would never in a 100 lifetimes suggest that I am a creative artist of singular note, but I can give the briefest explanation of this from my own experience as a novelist.  When I wrote the novel “Making the Arsenal” for example, I knew it was going to be the story of a fictional journalist in London in 1910, and would trace the events of what was a momentous year.  I knew more or less what happened that year, but during the nine months it took to write the book I discovered a lot more and those discoveries forced me to twist the actions of the characters quite a bit.  And I gave the journalist and the fictional characters he met lives – during those nine months they became real people.  The resultant book was not the novel I imagined when I started.

This is the dilemma all artists face with all works – and it is what Dylan was referring to in his comment.  We see it happening throughout his songs, but it is particularly interesting in My Back Pages because of the other issues that Dylan is seeking to resolve here.

Clinton Heylin adds to this perspective on the song the notion that Dylan changed quite a few of the lines as he worked on the piece just prior to recording, simply to make it easier to sing, and to make the words easier to understand.  But in so doing he has made the meaning of the lyrics more obscure – and that gives an interesting effect.

He also makes the point that because of the Byrds recording of the song we have a different view of the song now – and the fact that they recorded only a portion of the song and that Dylan didn’t seem to mind, suggests that either he really didn’t have a deep meaning expressed in the song or he didn’t care about the song too much.

The simple meaning comes from the chorus lines – that when he was younger he thought, as the young often do, that he knew everything.  Now he is older he knows nothing.

And maybe that is all there is… because …  if that is the meaning, then what better way to express it than with a set of words where the meaning is completely obscured.  Say it simply and you have no song – just the chorus.  If you want the song to survive and be remembered it needs something else.  That can’t be the music, because this is an acoustic album.  So it becomes ever more obscure words.

Or, to go a different route, do we take the fact that Dylan himself didn’t perform the song on stage until a quarter of a century after he wrote it, as a sign that he felt it didn’t really mean anything?

In one sense Dylan criticising Dylan is a half way house between Blowing in the Wind (all the answers are out there, you only have to look) and Subterranean Homesick Blues (everything is so screwed we can’t even see what the question is, let alone the answer).

The song is simple, the chord sequence offers no surprises (any regular folk or rock musician could sit down and play it without thinking as a warm up).  But they work together fine.  The song is a song we remember, therefore, because the melody itself works its magic around the chords, and is the vehicle for a set of lyrics we only half understand.

Dylan also said in May 1965 that he was trying to write three dimensional songs, not one dimensional songs – a worthy aim indeed, but one which takes us into all sorts of problem areas.

To illustrate my point, consider John Donne who could take us into as many dimensions as he wanted with “Go and catch a falling star” through writing

Go and catch a falling star,

    Get with child a mandrake root,

Tell me where all past years are,

    Or who cleft the devil’s foot,

Teach me to hear mermaids singing,

Or to keep off envy’s stinging,

            And find

            What wind

Serves to advance an honest mind.

But he wasn’t trying to get 3D out of music and lyrics.  Donne called this famous poem a “song” but it remains for us just words.  Dylan has to try and do all this with the words while fitting them against a never varying tune.

It is interesting that at the 30th Anniversary Tribute Concert in 1992, Dylan performed “My Back Pages”, using the Byrd’s approach, with George HarrisonEric ClaptonTom Petty,Neil Young, and Roger McGuinn all taking on a verse.  (It is on The 30th Anniversary Concert Celebration album.)

What does that tell us?  That there are so many dimensions being attempted that each verse is disassociated from the rest?  Or did someone just say “hey why don’t we do a verse each?”

Just taking the first three lines

Crimson flames tied through my ears
Rollin’ high and mighty traps
Pounced with fire on flaming roads

We have something that is impossible to disentangle.  Could he be saying, “I see the world burning” – or is it something else?

If there really is a clue then I think it comes in that first verse with the lines

“We’ll meet on edges, soon,” said I
Proud ’neath heated brow

To me that simply means, right out at the edge of contemporary thought and analysis there is a new way of seeing the world.  We can get there through many different routes, if we think about it enough.

So some of it does make clear sense such as verse two’s commentaries about prejudice, in verse three he moves on to the fact that he’s getting through quite a few lovers and would-be lovers, and the aftermath of failed affairs.

The eternal right wing propagandists get a knock as Dylan reminds us with the lines about the self ordained professor, that the world is much more complex than we can ever express

Yet, in the end, if you want the song summarised in two lines, it has to be

My pathway led by confusion boats
Mutiny from stern to bow

The song is simple, and in the end so is the meaning.  “I have no idea what is going on here,” says Bob, but that at the time was not quite the message most fans wanted to hear.

The problem with the song is that at the time he didn’t have at that moment was a musical equivalent to that message of confusion.  That would come, but it required a lot of amplification, a variety of instruments, and a rejection of the classic folk music format of rotating chords.  Subterranean is a perfect example of where this journey took him.

Index to all the songs reviewed.

Posted in Uncategorized | 31 Comments

I believe in you. The meanings within Bob Dylan’s song

This article revised 24 December 2017 including the addition of the video of the live version.

By Tony Attwood

This overtly religious song has an interesting sub-plot, the issue of rejection, of being the outsider.  It is the theme that every artist (perhaps except Shakespeare and Beethoven) must suffer from at some stage – the rejection by those that don’t quite understand what the hell is going on inside the artist’s head.

So the artist steps back and to sustain his sense of self-belief, has a choice.  Either he gives up, or he continues to believe in what he has done, or he believes in something else which is thought to be guiding him on.

Thus it is with Dylan, who has had many criticisms from questions about the quality of his vocals to his “right” to go electric, from his abandonment of the music of civil rights and revolt to the music of surrealism, to his decision to become a born-again Christian and (following the teaching) to tell the world about it.

What is remarkable about the recording of this song on “Slow Train” is the way in which Mark Knopfler (who was specifically approached by Dylan to play lead on this album) copes with all this.   Brilliantly, is the answer, for it is the guitar work of Knopfler which moves this recording from excellent to stunning.  To the best of my knowledge Knopfler is not an overtly Christian man.

Interestingly the official version of the lyric doesn’t emphasise that this is a religious piece as we have “you” not “You”.  But the consensus is that it is a hymn.

The song is so simple that it could easily not work – it needs the accompaniment to make it happen.  There’s a lovely musical twist too, going to the flattened 7th, the blue chord, on the word “town”.  It is the human approach to the God that is carried by that chordal change.   Dylan says, in that use of the flattened 7th that he is just a regular guy who sings the blues, approaching his new faith.

And they, they look at me and frown
They’d like to drive me from this town
They don’t want me around
’Cause I believe in you

The only element here that gives us the clue that this certainly is a religious song is the end of this first verse, “They’d like to drive me from this town, They don’t want me around, ’Cause I believe in you”   People who are just happy in the friendship and love of others don’t get persecuted.

So it continues…

They show me to the door
They say don’t come back no more
’Cause I don’t be like they’d like me to
And I walk out on my own
A thousand miles from home
But I don’t feel alone
’Cause I believe in you

Everything here could be about another person, not Jesus.  It is just about someone staying with Dylan to sustain him.  It could be a song of a father being driven away from his children as the result of a vindictive divorce.

This is, in fact, the exact opposite of the songs of disdain, and it does sound like a song to his God, although once one thinks about it being to a son or daughter, it is hard to get that thought out of one’s head.

The middle 8 takes us on…

I believe in you even through the tears and the laughter
I believe in you even though we be apart
I believe in you even on the morning after

And then we have the extraordinary change – the sort of change that marks out the brilliant song writer from the ordinary.

Oh, when the dawn is nearing
Oh, when the night is disappearing
Oh, this feeling is still here in my heart

It’s interesting that he should choose these words since a person who believed in himself and the love of friends would never find such times threatening.  Instead the dawn could well be a moment of re-birth and re-affirming of oneself and one’s life.  But it seems, not for Dylan at this time.

From the position of the Christian Dylan has no problem.  But Dylan’s great problem from the position of a militant atheist is that he could not find this security and belief in other people.  He had to turn to a God to find this security, never really knowing that some can do it by themselves.  The swami finds it through a faith in the self – but that seems lacking to Dylan, the supreme artist reaching out for help…

The theme is always the same.

Don’t let me drift too far
Keep me where you are
Where I will always be renewed
And that which you’ve given me today
Is worth more than I could pay
And no matter what they say
I believe in you

And so the ultimate crisis of the converted.  Friends or religion?  Dylan is clear.

Oh, though my friends forsake me
Oh, even that couldn’t make me go back

And one wonders what Dylan’s music would have been like if he had only been able to believe in himself more often.  Clearly he did much of the time, but not always.

Listening to the song and hearing it as a non-religious piece is a revelation in itself.  Just because Dylan probably meant it as a hymn and a confession doesn’t mean that this is how it has to be.   True, the religiosity is ultimately overwhelming, but as a love song it would be so utterly beautiful.  To have that sung to you would surely be the greatest tribute.

Here’s the live version – and it has the almighty When He Returns straight after it.  Sorry about the ad in between – I can’t edit that, but you can skip in a few seconds.

This was the 100th song analysed on this site (just in case you are interested).

What else is on the site

1: Over 460 reviews of Dylan songs.  There is an index to these in alphabetical order on the home page, and an index to the songs in the order they were written in the Chronology Pages.

2: The Chronology.  We’ve taken the songs we can find recordings of and put them in the order they were written (as far as possible) not in the order they appeared on albums.  The chronology is more or less complete and is now linked to all the reviews on the site.  We have also produced overviews of Dylan’s work year by year.     The index to the chronologies is here.

3: Bob Dylan’s themes.  We publish a wide range of articles about Bob Dylan and his compositions.  There is an index here.

4:   The Discussion Group    We now have a discussion group “Untold Dylan” on Facebook.  Just type the phrase “Untold Dylan” in, on your Facebook page or follow this link 

5:  Bob Dylan’s creativity.   We’re fascinated in taking the study of Dylan’s creative approach further.  The index is in Dylan’s Creativity.

6: You might also like: A classification of Bob Dylan’s songs and partial Index to Dylan’s Best Opening Lines and our articles on various writers’ lists of Dylan’s ten greatest songs.

And please do note   The Bob Dylan Project, which lists every Dylan song in alphabetical order, and has links to licensed recordings and performances by Dylan and by other artists, is starting to link back to our reviews

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

New Pony: the meaning of Dylan’s music and the lyrics

By Tony Attwood

Where there is Dylan, there is the blues.   Where there is the blues there is always incredible variation, despite the fact that most blues are based on two chords.  Although interestingly here we are down to two chords (and not four chords as Clinton Heylin amusingly says in “Still on the Road”.)

What Heylin does however (and hopefully with much more accuracy) is quote Dylan talking to John Mankiewicz in November 1978 in which Dylan says of the blues, “I just do it for my own self.  I found out that the Johnson songs aren’t played the way I always thought they were…”

Not that it is the slightest bit relevant to a general understanding of Dylan’s music, I had exactly the same experience aged 16 or 17, living in Dorset (on the south coast of England, a conservative rural county) when I heard the original Robert Johnson recording of “Hell hound on my trail” for the first time.  I wasn’t just amazed, I was annoyed – annoyed that the world had hid this music from me.  How could no one have told me?    I suspect Dylan was reporting a similar experience.  You hear Johnson himself and go “Oh my!!!”  The original blues is just not like the blues we hear today.  If you’ve never done it, get the Robert Johnson original and just sit and listen.  It doesn’t make you feel good, but it sure eats your soul.

“New Pony” however is quite different, for it is just about the most produced Dylan blues of all time, as befits the highly produced and rehearsed “Street Legal” album.  It is there, I guess, to say, “no matter where I take my muse, there is always the blues.”  And that’s fair enough.

If you listen to Charlie Patton’s “Pony Blues” you’ll hear a very different song, but one that is closer than many other Patton songs to our understanding of the blues today.  It’s a two chord song as well for the most part (a third chord is introduced in the last verse), so given Dylan’s knowledge of Patton (see for example High Water) it is quite possible this is the origin of the notion of “New Pony” – although Dylan and Patton sound nothing like each other.

The original  song seems to have been written in Patton’s teens, but this version was recorded on 14 June 1929 and went on to become a standard Delta Blues song, performed by many other singers in the region.

So why all this talk about Patton when looking at Dylan’s “New Pony” which has no real reference to Patton within it?   Because on the self same album (Street Legal) as New Pony we find, “Where are you tonight?” which contains the lines

Her father would emphasize you got to be more than streetwise
But he practices what he preached from the heart
A full-blooded Cherokee, he predicted to me
The time and the place that the trouble would start

Not too much is known about Patton’s antecedents, but it is suggested that Patton could indeed have been a “full-blood Cherokee”.

All right, none of this would stand up in court, but it is a clue as to where Dylan was coming from with this song.  And if we listen to Dylan’s “High Water” and the Patton original, then it is quite clear that Dylan can travel a million miles from his source when creating his own composition – but the relationship is still there.

Here’s the lyrics of the original Patton song

Baby, saddle my pony, saddle up my black mare
Baby, saddle my pony, saddle up my black mare
I’m gonna find a rider, baby, in the world somewhere
“Hello central, the matter with your line?”
“Hello central, matter, Lord, with your line?”
“Come a storm last night an’ tore the wire down”
Got a brand new Shetland, man, already trained
Brand new Shetland, baby, already trained
Just get in the saddle, tighten up on your reins
And a brownskin woman like somethin’ fit to eat
Brownskin woman like somethin’ fit to eat
But a jet black woman, don’t put your hands on me
Took my baby, to meet the mornin’ train
Took baby, meet that mornin’ train
An’ the blues come down, baby, like showers of rain
I got somethin’ to tell you when I gets a chance
Somethin’ to tell you when I get a chance
I don’t wanna marry, just wanna be your man

Sex, the pony, and then with Dylan, the devil (the nod to Robert Johnson’s soul of course)

Once I had a pony, her name was Lucifer
I had a pony, her name was Lucifer
She broke her leg and she needed shooting
I swear it hurt me more than it could ever have hurted her

So we start with the pony, and go to the woman

Sometimes I wonder what’s going on in the mind of Miss X
Sometimes I wonder what’s going on in the mind of Miss X
You know she got such a sweet disposition
I never know what the poor girl’s gonna do to me next

And the two get mixed

I got a new pony, she knows how to fox-trot, lope and pace
Well, I got a new pony, she knows how to fox-trot, lope and pace
She got great big hind legs
And long black shaggy hair above her face

A Shetland pony or a woman?  The argument doesn’t really need any more illustration, but I would throw in one wonderful Dylan line.  It doesn’t really relate to much but it is just a great line…

They say you’re usin’ voodoo, your feet walk by themselves

Lucifer indeed!   Dylan ends…

Come over here pony,  I,  I wanna climb up one time on you

Charlie sang,

Just get in the saddle, tighten up on your reins

Sex and the blues, blues and sex.  Totally entwined.

Posted in Uncategorized | 17 Comments

True love tends to forget: Dylan laughs at himself from Mexico to Tibet

By Tony Attwood

“True love” doesn’t do that much for me.  It’s just another song, although it has a really interesting use of chords in the verse.  When has Dylan used

A / C sharp minor / B minor

as a sequence before or since?  And there’s an E11 in there at the end of the third line too.

But if the chords are unusual, the lyrics are not.   He feels maybe he’s had enough, but no, actually he loves her.  Well, ok.  But it’s been done before.  True love tends to forget the problems, the rows, the mistakes, even when it is “like playing Russian roulette”

So, that’s it then.   But no, because suddenly, amazingly, the chord sequence changes.  Yes, this is the middle 8, so we expect a change, but even so, we are in A major and if that is not a pure and simple A major then what is it?

But next all hell breaks lose.  The chord is G, then we modulate to D, then it is D minor….

And when we focus on the lyric there is the lyric.  What are we to make of this?

I was lying down in the reeds without any oxygen
I saw you in the wilderness among the men
I saw you drift into infinity and come back again
All you got to do is wait ’till I’ll tell you when

I have no idea what this is about, but the imagery is exactly what Dylan does at his best.  New images, new metaphors and we have to work them out for ourselves.   Going back to the “don’t forsake me baby” in the next verse is a pain.  But even that verse patter is redeemed at the end by the “Mexico to Tibet” comment – a totally random combination.

If only the whole song could have been based around that middle 8.  It is so good it is worth saying twice, as Dylan sings it twice.  He clearly knew that he’d done it there.  If only…

I was lying down in the reeds without any oxygen
I saw you in the wilderness among the men
Saw you drift into infinity and come back again
All you got to do is wait and I’ll tell you when

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVsKECfxUNQ

In this live performance listen to the way Dylan treats the lyrics with his extra inserts “True love that’s right True love un hu”   When did Dylan ever need to do this? He’s making fun of his own lyrics!  And he destroys the wonderful electric middle eight.

And here’s the thing: run this video of the live performance but stay with it because up next comes one of the great, great live re-workings of a Dylan song by Dylan.

Compare and contrast: Lost Dylan on stage followed by Dylan the absolute genius on stage.  Same guy, different songs.

What else is on the site

You’ll find an index to our latest posts arranged by themes and subjects on the home page.  You can also see details of our main sections on this site at the top of this page under the picture.

The index to the 500+ Dylan compositions reviewed is now on a new page of its own.  You will find it here.  It contains reviews of every Dylan composition that we can find a recording of – if you know of anything we have missed please do write in.

We also have a discussion group “Untold Dylan” on Facebook.  Just type the phrase “Untold Dylan” in, on your Facebook page or follow this link 

And please do note   The Bob Dylan Project, which lists every Dylan song in alphabetical order, and has links to licensed recordings and performances by Dylan and by other artists, is starting to link back to our reviews

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Is your love in vain?

Do you love me, or are you just extending goodwill?

What a stunning opening – perhaps one of the most extraordinary openings of all of Dylan’s songs – and as we quickly see this is actually a song about Dylan, about the man himself, and thus is quite unusual.

It is also a song with a very singable melody, and it deserves the excellent production it gets on Street Legal – and it deserves to open side two of the original LP.

The critics hated it of course, saying how poor the production was, how trite it all was, and how sexist this song was.  Which raises all sorts of questions, such as “does the songwriter have to produce visions that are always right-on?”   If so why?  Such a politically correct vision never existed in the past, why should it now?  Is Dylan less of an artist if he has sexist views (although to be clear I don’t think there is sexism here)?  I can’t see that.  Yes there are limits, but profound art remains profound art no matter what the political or social base.

Musically Dylan is very much on home ground here with his descending bass lines that almost all of his great songs have.  And here the descent of the bass gets a fulsome outing.

It is in line one, line two, line three, line four, line five… yes five of the six lines of the song.  The only problem is that the bassist must get rather bored.

Dylan is doubting the lady not because of herself, but because of himself, his crazy life, what he is, what he has become through endless touring.  He’s difficult, and he’s not going to change just because a woman wants him.

Are you so fast that you cannot see that I must have solitude?
When I am in the darkness, why do you intrude?
Do you know my world, do you know my kind
Or must I explain?
Will you let me be myself
Or is your love in vain?

He’s done it all, he doesn’t need to be shown all the tricks…

Well I’ve been to the mountain and I’ve been in the wind
I’ve been in and out of happiness
I have dined with kings, I’ve been offered wings
And I’ve never been too impressed

So when he says, “All right, I’ll take a chance, I will fall in love with you” he is doing so as a world weary man who has had it all.  And so it is back to basics – real basics.

Can you cook and sew, make flowers grow
Do you understand my pain?
Are you willing to risk it all
Or is your love in vain?

There is no need for criticism here, this is a beautiful melody, an inventive chord structure, a rehearsed band – even the organist gets his lines right – and overall it just sounds good.   It may not be the message that some critics wanted to here, but why shouldn’t Dylan reflect on his own condition, as much as mythical Egyptian creatures like Isis?

Here’s an interesting extra point.  Robert Johnson (him of Highway 61 crossroads fame) wrote a song called “Love in Vain”.   Just thought you’d like to know (in case you didn’t already).

The index of reviews.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

If you see her, say hello; the multiplicity of what Dylan is.

By Tony Attwood

“If you see her, say hello” is one of those songs that has within it has a complete multiplicity of what Dylan is.  And it is also one of those songs that some of the “experts” on Dylan seem to go off on their own journey and miss what is so obviously there for us.

The early version of the song that opens disk three of the Bootleg Series 1-3, reminds us that Dylan is, or was, a fine guitarist, a man who could pluck unusual chords from nowhere to give his songs unexpected twists and meanings within the music that reflects the lyrics.

If you really want to hear early Dylan seeking to express himself both musically and lyrically, this track is a beautiful example.  Even the typical wailing harmonica in its standard place as the penultimate verse, has a point as the song becomes more and restless in the lyric and the music.

In this early recording however Dylan holds himself back much more than in the version on Blood on the Tracks, keeping us lyrical and poignant until we get to “and I never gotten used to it” and then the angst takes over.

The version that most of us know intimately however is the one from that masterpiece of an album “Blood on the Tracks” which simplifies the musical accompaniment considerably.   Here, it comes after the wild craziness of “Lily Rosemary and the Jack of Hearts” and in total contrast to the previous track it is tentative beyond anything on the earlier version.

Indeed, it is an interesting experiment to play the end of “Lily” running as it does at hyper speed.  It’s final line is “Most of all she was thinking about the Jack of Hearts…”  Then there is the harmonica verse which seems to leave us with just the organ playing. The between track pause and then that oh so slight, so unsure, we get the rocking between A and G, which symbolises all uncertainty whenever it starts a pop, rock or folk song.

It is in fact a total and utter contrast to the previous track, and all the more powerful for that.

So what we start with is a hesitant lost love song, just as in the early version, and it feels like we have something of a rarity here.  What we end with is a typical Dylan song of disdain.   It is, “Once upon a time you looked so fine…” and “You’ve got a lot of nerve to say you are my friend” all over again.

Half disdain half lost love.  Now there’s a thing.

If you listen to the Blood on the tracks recording in perfect silence you can hear a slight upping of the ante as the second verse comes in.  But still it is peaceful, as the singer describes his lost love.  OK he’s heard she is in Tangier, and Tangier is not necessarily a nice place to be – or at least it certainly wasn’t around the time the song was written.  I can attest to that out of personal experience.  Marrakesh wasn’t as great as that song suggested etiher.

But they’ve had a falling out, but it is accepted.  It happens.  He was really hurt, but he’s not blaming her.  If that’s what she needs to do ok.

OK except…

Three things happen in the song.  First it speeds up quite alarmingly as it goes through – which is unusual.  Dylan and his band a professionals and they know how to keep time. So it seems deliberate.  As does the increasingly frantic singing.  Just compare the way the song ends with that gentle lilting opening.  What on earth has happened?

Or consider the way the singing of the opening verses starts with a rising scale on the bass.  It sounds like an old time folk song.  By the last verse the bassist can’t actually play the scale and has to drop a note, it is all getting so frantic.

the rising scale at the start is old time folk

In this version the chords reflect the changing message by being a combination of rock blues chords and classic folk song.  It is in D major and the blues chord C major is heard suddenly quite unexpectedly at the end of the second line (which takes the sequence GDCA).

Then we’ve got the standard chords built around the key of D – Bm, G, D, G.  But the “damage” is done with that single unexpected C major chord.  Through it, the potential for all hell being let lose appears.

If you see her, say hello, she might be in Tangier
She left here last early Spring, is living there, I hear

That opening is interestingly light.  “Spring” is even skittish, as Spring can be.  A time to grow and move upwards, and that’s what she did.   And he’s really just sending her his best, saying, “I still think of you.”

Say for me that I’m all right though things get kind of slow
She might think that I’ve forgotten her, don’t tell her it isn’t so

Then with the opening of the next verse there is still no hint of what is on the horizon.

We had a falling-out, like lovers often will
And to think of how she left that night, it still brings me a chill

The “chill” is there in the music – oh how it is there.  If you’ve never listened to it in this way, go back and play this, because it is an amazing turn of the moment.  We go from light to dark in one line.  And there is no way back, for “separation” is almost shouted out…

And though our separation, it pierced me to the heart
She still lives inside of me, we’ve never been apart

The next verse does the same trick.  It starts without malice

If you get close to her, kiss her once for me
I always have respected her for busting out and getting free

But then, listen to what happens with “happy” it is called out, almost sarcastically.  Sarcasm?  This is not where we started at all.  And then we have “the bitter taste still lingers”

So he is still blaming himself, but oh how bitter he is.  This crops up again with “used to it”, and the edge is there in the voice – he’s in pain, and he’s moving back to those songs of disdain.

Now the rising scale is gone and the speed is really moving, and we find again in the last first that shouting out of “way”.  He’s just become frantic in what started as a peaceful lost love song.

Sundown, yellow moon, I replay the past
I know every scene by heart, they all went by so fast
If she’s passing back this way, I’m not that hard to find 
Tell her she can look me up if she’s got the time

He’s hurting, and he’s ready to pass the blame.

All the songs on the site

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments